IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v76y2022i4p414-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Black Box to Shining Spotlight: Using Random Forest Prediction Intervals to Illuminate the Impact of Assumptions in Linear Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew J. Sage
  • Yang Liu
  • Joe Sato

Abstract

We introduce a pair of Shiny web applications that allow users to visualize random forest prediction intervals alongside those produced by linear regression models. The apps are designed to help undergraduate students deepen their understanding of the role that assumptions play in statistical modeling by comparing and contrasting intervals produced by regression models with those produced by more flexible algorithmic techniques. We describe the mechanics of each approach, illustrate the features of the apps, provide examples highlighting the insights students can gain through their use, and discuss our experience implementing them in an undergraduate class. We argue that, contrary to their reputation as a black box, random forests can be used as a spotlight, for educational purposes, illuminating the role of assumptions in regression models and their impact on the shape, width, and coverage rates of prediction intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew J. Sage & Yang Liu & Joe Sato, 2022. "From Black Box to Shining Spotlight: Using Random Forest Prediction Intervals to Illuminate the Impact of Assumptions in Linear Regression," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 414-429, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:414-429
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2107568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2107568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2107568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:414-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.