IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v76y2022i4p372-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linearity of Unbiased Linear Model Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Portnoy

Abstract

Best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE’s) are known to be optimal in many respects under normal assumptions. Since variance minimization doesn’t depend on normality and unbiasedness is often considered reasonable, many statisticians have felt that BLUE’s ought to preform relatively well in some generality. The result here considers the general linear model and shows that any measurable estimator that is unbiased over a moderately large family of distributions must be linear. Thus, imposing unbiasedness cannot offer any improvement over imposing linearity. The problem was suggested by Hansen, who showed that any estimator unbiased for nearly all error distributions (with finite covariance) must have a variance no smaller than that of the best linear estimator in some parametric subfamily. Specifically, the hypothesis of linearity can be dropped from the classical Gauss–Markov Theorem. This might suggest that the best unbiased estimator should provide superior performance, but the result here shows that the best unbiased regression estimator can be no better than the best linear estimator.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Portnoy, 2022. "Linearity of Unbiased Linear Model Estimators," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 372-375, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:372-375
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2022. "A Modern Gauss-Markov Theorem? Really?," MPRA Paper 112607, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lihua Lei & Jeffrey Wooldridge, 2022. "What Estimators Are Unbiased For Linear Models?," Papers 2212.14185, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:372-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.