IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v76y2022i4p353-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bias Analysis for Misclassification Errors in both the Response Variable and Covariate

Author

Listed:
  • Juxin Liu
  • Annshirley Afful
  • Holly Mansell
  • Yanyuan Ma

Abstract

Abstract–Much literature has focused on statistical inference for misclassified response variables or misclassified covariates. However, misclassification in both the response variable and the covariate has received very limited attention within applied fields and the statistics community. In situations where the response variable and the covariate are simultaneously subject to misclassification errors, an assumption of independent misclassification errors is often used for convenience without justification. This article aims to show the harmful consequences of inappropriate adjustment for joint misclassification errors. In particular, we focus on the wrong adjustment by ignoring the dependence between the misclassification process of the response variable and the covariate. In this article, the dependence of misclassification in both variables is characterized by covariance-type parameters. We extend the original definition of dependence parameters to a more general setting. We discover a single quantity that governs the dependence of the two misclassification processes. Moreover, we propose likelihood ratio tests to check the nondifferential/independent misclassification assumption in main study/internal validation study designs. Our simulation studies indicate that ignoring the dependent error structure can be even worse than ignoring all the misclassification errors when the validation data size is relatively small. The methodology is illustrated by a real data example.

Suggested Citation

  • Juxin Liu & Annshirley Afful & Holly Mansell & Yanyuan Ma, 2022. "Bias Analysis for Misclassification Errors in both the Response Variable and Covariate," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 353-362, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:353-362
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2066725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2066725
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2066725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:353-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.