IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v76y2022i4p329-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Li
  • Minhao Cheng
  • Cho-Jui Hsieh
  • Thomas C. M. Lee

Abstract

Despite the efficiency and scalability of machine learning systems, recent studies have demonstrated that many classification methods, especially Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), are vulnerable to adversarial examples; that is, examples that are carefully crafted to fool a well-trained classification model while being indistinguishable from natural data to human. This makes it potentially unsafe to apply DNNs or related methods in security-critical areas. Since this issue was first identified by Biggio et al. and Szegedy et al., much work has been done in this field, including the development of attack methods to generate adversarial examples and the construction of defense techniques to guard against such examples. This article aims to introduce this topic and its latest developments to the statistical community, primarily focusing on the generation and guarding of adversarial examples. Computing codes (in Python and R) used in the numerical experiments are publicly available for readers to explore the surveyed methods. It is the hope of the authors that this article will encourage more statisticians to work on this important and exciting field of generating and defending against adversarial examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Li & Minhao Cheng & Cho-Jui Hsieh & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2022. "A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methods," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 329-345, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:329-345
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2021.2006781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2021.2006781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2021.2006781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:4:p:329-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.