IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2021i4p414-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pairwise Comparisons Using Ranks in the One-Way Model

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis D. Boos
  • Siyu Duan

Abstract

The Wilcoxon rank sum test for two independent samples and the Kruskal–Wallis rank test for the one-way model with k independent samples are very competitive robust alternatives to the two-sample t-test and k-sample F-test when the underlying data have tails longer than the normal distribution. However, these positives for rank methods do not extend as readily to methods for making all pairwise comparisons used to reveal where the differences in location may exist. Here, we show that the closed method of Marcus et al. applied to ranks is quite powerful for both small and large samples and better than any methods suggested in the list of applied nonparametric texts found in the recent study by Richardson. In addition, we show that the closed method applied to means is even more powerful than the classical Tukey–Kramer method applied to means, which itself is very competitive for nonnormal data with moderately long tails and small samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis D. Boos & Siyu Duan, 2021. "Pairwise Comparisons Using Ranks in the One-Way Model," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 414-423, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:4:p:414-423
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2020.1860819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2020.1860819
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2020.1860819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:4:p:414-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.