IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2021i1p76-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assumption Lean Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Berk
  • Andreas Buja
  • Lawrence Brown
  • Edward George
  • Arun Kumar Kuchibhotla
  • Weijie Su
  • Linda Zhao

Abstract

It is well known that with observational data, models used in conventional regression analyses are commonly misspecified. Yet in practice, one tends to proceed with interpretations and inferences that rely on correct specification. Even those who invoke Box’s maxim that all models are wrong proceed as if results were generally useful. Misspecification, however, has implications that affect practice. Regression models are approximations to a true response surface and should be treated as such. Accordingly, regression parameters should be interpreted as statistical functionals. Importantly, the regressor distribution affects targets of estimation and regressor randomness affects the sampling variability of estimates. As a consequence, inference should be based on sandwich estimators or the pairs (x–y) bootstrap. Traditional prediction intervals lose their pointwise coverage guarantees, but empirically calibrated intervals can be justified for future populations. We illustrate the key concepts with an empirical application.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Berk & Andreas Buja & Lawrence Brown & Edward George & Arun Kumar Kuchibhotla & Weijie Su & Linda Zhao, 2021. "Assumption Lean Regression," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 76-84, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:76-84
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1592781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2019.1592781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2019.1592781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:76-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.