IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2021i1p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective Bayesian testing for the correlation coefficient under divergence-based priors

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Peng
  • Min Wang

Abstract

The correlation coefficient is a commonly used criterion to measure the strength of a linear relationship between the two quantitative variables. For a bivariate normal distribution, numerous procedures have been proposed for testing a precise null hypothesis of the correlation coefficient, whereas the construction of flexible procedures for testing a set of (multiple) precise and/or interval hypotheses has received less attention. This paper fills the gap by proposing an objective Bayesian testing procedure using the divergence-based priors. The proposed Bayes factors can be used for testing any combination of precise and interval hypotheses and also allow a researcher to quantify evidence in the data in favor of the null or any other hypothesis under consideration. An extensive simulation study is conducted to compare the performances between the proposed Bayesian methods and some existing ones in the literature. Finally, a real-data example is provided for illustrative purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Peng & Min Wang, 2021. "Objective Bayesian testing for the correlation coefficient under divergence-based priors," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 41-51, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:41-51
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1677266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2019.1677266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2019.1677266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.