IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2021i1p23-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for Positive Quadrant Dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan-Fa Tang
  • Dewei Wang
  • Hammou El Barmi
  • Joshua M. Tebbs

Abstract

We develop an empirical likelihood (EL) approach to test independence of two univariate random variables X and Y versus the alternative that X and Y are strictly positive quadrant dependent (PQD). Establishing this type of ordering between X and Y is of interest in many applications, including finance, insurance, engineering, and other areas. Adopting the framework in Einmahl and McKeague, we create a distribution-free test statistic that integrates a localized EL ratio test statistic with respect to the empirical joint distribution of X and Y. When compared to well-known existing tests and distance-based tests we develop by using copula functions, simulation results show the EL testing procedure performs well in a variety of scenarios when X and Y are strictly PQD. We use three datasets for illustration and provide an online R resource practitioners can use to implement the methods in this article. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan-Fa Tang & Dewei Wang & Hammou El Barmi & Joshua M. Tebbs, 2021. "Testing for Positive Quadrant Dependence," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 23-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:23-30
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1607554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2019.1607554
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2019.1607554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:23-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.