IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v67y2013i3p134-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Effect and Remedies of Shrinkage on Classification Probability Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Zhang
  • Yufeng Liu
  • Zhengxiao Wu

Abstract

Shrinkage methods have been shown to be effective for classification problems. As a form of regularization, shrinkage through penalization helps to avoid overfitting and produces accurate classifiers for prediction, especially when the dimension is relatively high. Despite the benefit of shrinkage on classification accuracy of resulting classifiers, in this article, we demonstrate that shrinkage creates biases on classification probability estimation. In many cases, this bias can be large and consequently yield poor class probability estimation when the sample size is small or moderate. We offer some theoretical insights into the effect of shrinkage and provide remedies for better class probability estimation. Using penalized logistic regression and proximal support vector machines as examples, we demonstrate that our proposed refit method gives similar classification accuracy and remarkable improvements on probability estimation on several simulated and real data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Zhang & Yufeng Liu & Zhengxiao Wu, 2013. "On the Effect and Remedies of Shrinkage on Classification Probability Estimation," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(3), pages 134-142, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:3:p:134-142
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2013.817356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2013.817356
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2013.817356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:3:p:134-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.