IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v66y2012i3p173-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation-Based Evaluation of the Asymptotic Power Formulas for Cox Models in Small Sample Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Kocak
  • Arzu Onar-Thomas

Abstract

Cox proportional hazards (PH) models are commonly used in medical research to investigate the associations between covariates and time-to-event outcomes. It is frequently noted that with less than 10 events per covariate, these models produce spurious results and therefore should not be used. Statistical literature contains asymptotic power formulas for the Cox model which can be used to determine the number of events needed to detect an association. Here, we investigate via simulations the performance of these formulas in small sample settings for Cox models with one or two covariates. Our simulations indicate that when the number of events is small, the power estimate based on the asymptotic formula is often inflated. The discrepancy between the asymptotic and empirical power is larger for the dichotomous covariate especially in cases where allocation of sample size to its levels is unequal. When more than one covariate is included in the same model, the discrepancy between the asymptotic power and the empirical power is even larger, especially when a high positive correlation exists between the two covariates.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Kocak & Arzu Onar-Thomas, 2012. "A Simulation-Based Evaluation of the Asymptotic Power Formulas for Cox Models in Small Sample Cases," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 173-179, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:66:y:2012:i:3:p:173-179
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2012.703873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2012.703873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2012.703873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emil Scosyrev & Fabrice Bancken, 2017. "Expected Precision of Estimation and Probability of Ruling Out a Hypothesis Based on a Confidence Interval," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 455-472, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:66:y:2012:i:3:p:173-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.