IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v28y2019i1p69-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants

Author

Listed:
  • Akrum Helfaya

Abstract

Both assessment and feedback have a vital impact on students’ learning. Using computer-based assessment (CBA) with constructive and prompt computer-based feedback (CBF) reduces the attainment gap of the new generation of digital students. Action research methodology was employed to explore students’ view of utilising CBA and/or CBF in teaching and learning practice. A survey was administered to 537 undergraduate students in the Management School of a British university to collect data about their perceptions of using CBA and CBF to assess their progress. Findings from students’ survey show that students are generally appreciated the use of and benefits of CBA and/or CBF in teaching accounting modules. Findings also reveal that many participants valued working online compared to paper-and-pencil assessment and they also appreciated the timely and constructive feedback-feedforward they received. Information technology (IT), therefore, can provide an innovative type of assessment and feedback that students’ desire in an effective manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Akrum Helfaya, 2019. "Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 69-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:69-99
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2018.1501716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2018.1501716
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2018.1501716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suliman M. N. Alnasser, 2022. "EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Integrating Computer-Based Feedback into Writing Classrooms: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2020. "Accounting education literature review (2019)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:69-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.