Author
Listed:
- Claudio de Araujo Wanderley
- John Cullen
- Mathew Tsamenyi
Abstract
Research has provided substantial evidence that firms engage in Corporate Political Activity/Strategy (CPA), as a form of relational work, to manage and influence political actors and shape political institutions in ways favourable to the firm. However, relatively little is known about how management accounting is mobilised in an organisation in order to support CPA attempts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how management accounting is implicated in relational work. We explore this issue in a Brazilian organisation (Electra), which was privatised as part of a wider privatisation program in Brazil. We draw on the institutional work and CPA (in particular on Oliver and Holzinger’s [2008. The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193538] framework) literature. By doing so, we find that our focal firm used a multiplicity of relational strategy types (i.e. reactive, anticipatory, defensive, and proactive) in a more simultaneous way than has previously been reported in the literature. Moreover, we identify four roles that management accounting may play in organisations’ attempts to engage in CPA. These roles were intertwined with the relational strategies adopted in our focal company. This finding contrasts with the research in management accounting, which has dichotomised passive and active responses to external pressures. We show that these two responses were blended in our case, and management accounting may be concomitantly implicated in compliance and influence strategies. We further discuss these findings in relation to the literature on relational work/strategy and management accounting.
Suggested Citation
Claudio de Araujo Wanderley & John Cullen & Mathew Tsamenyi, 2021.
"Corporate political strategy: the roles of management accounting in relational work,"
Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 200-226, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accfor:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:200-226
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2020.1848321
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:200-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.