IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v25y2001i3p264-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Owen
  • Tracey Swift
  • Karen Hunt

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a remarkable resurgence of academic, professional and corporate interest in the area of social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR). One striking common feature of the myriad of initiatives taking place lies in an apparent concern to address the information needs of organisational stakeholders via the promotion of dialogue and engagement. Drawing on a programme of short interviews with corporate managers, representatives of the ‘big five’, consultants and NGOs active in the field, this paper suggests that despite seemingly endorsing active stakeholder engagement current SEAAR practice amounts to little more than corporate spin. An overwhelming concern with promoting the ‘business case’ in developing SEAAR together with a profound reluctance to address the issue of corporate governance largely removes any potential for enhancing the accountability and transparency of powerful economic organisations. Most fundamentally, failure to address the crucial dimension of corporate power robs current SEAAR of a much needed radical edge.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Owen & Tracey Swift & Karen Hunt, 2001. "Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 264-282, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:25:y:2001:i:3:p:264-282
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:25:y:2001:i:3:p:264-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.