IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v24y2000i3p278-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investors’ perceptions of the relative importance of investment issue

Author

Listed:
  • John Tippet

Abstract

With a view to establishing what issues are important to investors in their investment decision, Australian equity investors asked to assess the relative importance of a range of issues, categorised broadly into "ethical" issues and "corporate goverance" issues. Responses indicate that the ethical issues of most concern to investors are: professional and good business practice, the promotion of Australian made, and encouragement of youth employment. Investors regarded the issues: aboriginal rights, uraniummining and the manufacture or sale of alchol as being relatively unimportant. With respect to matters of good corporate governance, investors were most concerned with the behaviour of directors; and regarded the failure to conduct a social or environmental audit as being relatively unimportant. These findings indicate, not unexpectedly, the importance to investors of good business practice and the encouragement of employment opportunities, particularly; but a perceived lack of interest in social accounting and environmental issues. In the ranking of some of the issues as being important, investor demographic variables, gender, age, education and wealth, were significant influences, with male investors, higher‐educated investors, and more wealthy investors predominating.

Suggested Citation

  • John Tippet, 2000. "Investors’ perceptions of the relative importance of investment issue," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 278-295, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:24:y:2000:i:3:p:278-295
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:24:y:2000:i:3:p:278-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.