IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v9y2012i2p147-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Consequences of Accounting Standards in Europe: The Role of EFRAG

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Abela
  • Araceli Mora

Abstract

The global financial crisis has accelerated the need for standard-setters to demonstrate that they understand the effects of the accounting standards they are setting. Within a European context, the endorsement process and the ultimate adoption of new and amended International Financial Reporting Standards into European Union law demand that there is evidence to support the assertion that such standards will improve financial reporting. Our analysis is anchored in the ideology theory of regulation which provides a compelling case for effect analysis to underpin the standard-setting process. For that process to work effectively, a number of key actors need to engage in the process. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to analyse the potential role of those actors in the standard-setter's analysis of effects. It is argued that there is a significant role for academic research to play in that process and that intermediaries, such as European Financial Reporting Advisory Group, can serve to bring research to the attention of the standard-setter. However, addressing the current disconnect between standard-setters and accounting researchers is not straightforward and we propose various strategies for how that relationship could be improved. We argue that these changes may lead to an improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of the standard-setting process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Abela & Araceli Mora, 2012. "Understanding the Consequences of Accounting Standards in Europe: The Role of EFRAG," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 147-170, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:147-170
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2012.720872
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2012.720872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "International Accounting Standardisation : Is Politics Back ?," Post-Print halshs-00665494, HAL.
    2. Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "International Accounting Standardisation: Is Politics Back?," Post-Print halshs-02145367, HAL.
    3. Katherine Schipper, 2010. "How can we measure the costs and benefits of changes in financial reporting standards?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 309-327.
    4. Robert K. Larson, 2007. "Constituent Participation and the IASB's International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 207-254, December.
    5. Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "International Accounting Standardisation: Is Politics Back?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 23-47, June.
    6. Willem Buijink, 2006. "Evidence‐based financial reporting regulation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(3‐4), pages 296-301, September.
    7. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Joerg‐Markus Hitz & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2009. "Relevance of Academic Research and Researchers' Role in the IASB's Financial Reporting Standard Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 455-492, December.
    8. David Alexander & Eva Eberhartinger, 2010. "The European Union Endorsement Process for International Financial Reporting Standards: A Telos-Based Analysis," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 37-62, June.
    9. Christian Leuz, 2010. "Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 229-256.
    10. Brian Singleton-Green, 2010. "The Communication Gap: Why Doesn't Accounting Research Make a Greater Contribution to Debates on Accounting Policy?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 129-145, December.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7512 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Brian Rutherford, 2011. "Accounting Research and Accounting Policy: What Kind of Gap?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 141-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hammed Afolabi & Ronita Ram & Gunnar Rimmel, 2022. "Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Araceli Mora & Martin Walker, 2015. "The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 620-650, August.
    3. Carien Van Mourik & Peter Walton, 2018. "The European IFRS Endorsement Process – in Search of a Single Voice," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Mora, Araceli, 2018. "The role of Politics and Economics in the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption/La influencia de la política y la economía en la adopción de las Normas Internacionales de Informa," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 407-428, Mayo.
    5. Gordon, Elizabeth A. & Gotti, Giorgio & Ho, Joanna H. & Mora, Araceli & Morris, Richard D., 2019. "Commentary: Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Raffaele Fiume, 2013. "Dialogue with standard setters," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 169-173.
    7. Elkins, Hamilton & Entwistle, Gary & Schmidt, Regan N., 2021. "The influence of opportunistic capital structure disclosure in international financial reporting on nonprofessional investors," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    8. Igor Álvarez & José Calvo & Araceli Mora, 2014. "Involving academics in the accounting standard setting process: an application of the Delphi methodology to the assessment of IASB proposals," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 765-791, August.
    9. Raffaele Fiume & Tiziano Onesti & Valerio Pieri, 2013. "Dialogue with standard setters," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 169-189.
    10. Araceli Mora, 2013. "Increasing the relevance of "Policy Relevant Research"," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 7-11.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Königsgruber, 2013. "Expertise-based lobbying and accounting regulation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 1009-1025, November.
    2. Roland Königsgruber & Stefan Palan, 2015. "Earnings management and participation in accounting standard-setting," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(1), pages 31-52, March.
    3. Marco Trombetta & Alfred Wagenhofer & Peter Wysocki, 2012. "The Usefulness of Academic Research in Understanding the Effects of Accounting Standards," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 127-146, December.
    4. Molina Sánchez, Horacio & Mora Enguídanos, Araceli, 2015. "Cambios conceptuales en la contabilidad de los arrendamientos: retos normativos y académicos," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 99-113.
    5. David Alexander & Anne Le Manh-Béna & Olivier J. Ramond, 2013. "Can the conceptual framework be all things to all (wo)men?," Post-Print hal-00991959, HAL.
    6. Crawford, Louise, 2019. "Exploring the emancipatory dimensions of globalisation: The struggle over IFRS8 and country-by-country reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Igor Álvarez & José Calvo & Araceli Mora, 2014. "Involving academics in the accounting standard setting process: an application of the Delphi methodology to the assessment of IASB proposals," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 765-791, August.
    8. Bamber, Matthew & McMeeking, Kevin, 2016. "An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 59-73.
    9. Samindi Ishara Hewa & Rajni Mala & Jinhua Chen, 2020. "IASB's independence in the due process: an examination of interest groups’ influence on the development of IFRS 9," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2585-2615, September.
    10. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    11. Jarosław Pawłowski, 2018. "The Usefulness Of Financial Reporting For Financial Instruments In The Decision-Making Processes Of Individual Investors," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(4), pages 99-113.
    12. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Raffaele Fiume & Tiziano Onesti & Valerio Pieri, 2013. "Dialogue with standard setters," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 169-189.
    14. Karen Handley & Elaine Evans & Sue Wright, 2020. "Understanding participation in accounting standard‐setting: the case of AASB ED 192 Revised Differential Reporting Framework," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3621-3645, December.
    15. Araceli Mora & Martin Walker, 2015. "The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 620-650, August.
    16. Barbara Masiello & Nicola Moscariello & Pietro Fera, 2018. "Political Marketing Strategies to Foster the Sustainability of Private Transnational Organisations: The Case of the IASB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Christian Leuz & Peter D. Wysocki, 2016. "The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 525-622, May.
    18. Kym Fraser & Benedict Sheehy, 2020. "Abundant Publications but Minuscule Impact: The Irrelevance of Academic Accounting Research on Practice and the Profession," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-36, October.
    19. Alain Burlaud, 2013. "Should Financial Statements Represent Fairly or be Relevant?," Working Papers halshs-00873959, HAL.
    20. Araceli Mora, 2013. "Increasing the relevance of "Policy Relevant Research"," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 7-11.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:147-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.