IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v11y2023i2p54-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and regional disparities in income level perspectives in United States agriculture sector

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Juhásová

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

  • Ján Buleca

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

  • Jana Vancová

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

  • Katarina Melasova

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

  • Viliam Kováč

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Agriculture, as one of the most important sectors of the economy of many countries, has to deal with gender inequality, which is part of it, among other problems. For centuries, women have been excluded from this area, but nowadays, they have the opportunity to participate in agricultural activities to the same extent as men and achieve an adequate income. The success of women in US agriculture in the form of their income can be explained through the six indicators: age, family involvement, farm area, farming period, female operators, and partnership by applying the regression analysis. The coefficient of determination shows that the Heartland Region regression model has the highest statistical significance, explaining 51.03 % of the investigated data variability. The second position is kept very closely by the Upper Midwest Region with a value of 50.06 %; the next ones are the Delta Region with a value of 46.37 %, the Great Lakes Region with 44.44 %, and the Northwest Region with 43.24 %. All the regression models assigned to these regions are suitable for explaining. Surprisingly, there are cases where a mutual ratio of the regression coefficients of the same indicator for the two specific regions is twice as high or lower. It reveals there are deliberate regional disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Juhásová & Ján Buleca & Jana Vancová & Katarina Melasova & Viliam Kováč, 2023. "Gender and regional disparities in income level perspectives in United States agriculture sector," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(2), pages 54-66, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:54-66
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(4)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/42/Juhasova_Gender_and_regional_disparities_in_income_level_perspectives_in_United_States_agriculture_sector.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(4)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoppe, Robert & MacDonald, James, 2013. "The Revised ERS Farm Typology: Classifying U.S. Farms To Reflect Today's Agriculture," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, issue 04, pages 1-1, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      agriculture; gender inequality; United States regions;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
      • J43 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Agricultural Labor Markets
      • N52 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:54-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.