IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jmef00/v2y2016i2p35-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complete study of a Coopetitive R D Alliance

Author

Listed:
  • David CARFI

    (Department of Mathematics University of California Riverside California USA)

  • Alessia Donato

    (University of Messina Italy)

Abstract

The paper proposes a mathematical model of coopetitive game that ana lyzes general asymmetric R D alliances The coopetitive point of view which con siders both collaboration and competition together allows to analyze the functioning of alliances that arise between small and large firms Starting from the economic models developed in managerial doctrine and from the model of coopetitive game in troduced by David Carf we adopt a mathematical analysis paying attention to some of the most debated quantitative questions and some analytical topics scarcely covered in the literature a mathematical model of coopetitive game particularly suitable for exploring a complex type of asymmetric R D alliances We propose a formal coopet itive approach with corresponding numerical example where the coopetitive variable of the model is a real variable A cooperative effort is suggested even if partners are potentially competitors in the marketplace and they could shape the payoff space by the coopetitive approach To maximize profits we suggested first of all a complete Pareto analysis introduced by David Carf secondly to share conveniently and fairly the utilities we propose a Kalai Smorodinsky solution of the bargaining deci sion problem in which the decisional constraint is the Pareto boundary of maximum collective utility

Suggested Citation

  • David CARFI & Alessia Donato, 2016. "Complete study of a Coopetitive R D Alliance," Journal of Mathematical Economics and Finance, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 35-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jmef00:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:35-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jmef00:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:35-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jmef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.