IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v9y2018i3(33)p1153-1163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Responsibility and Children Protection The 1996 Hague Convention vs the 1993 Minsk Convention

Author

Listed:
  • Aslan ABASHIDZE

    (RUDN University Moscow Russia)

  • Denis GUGUNSKIY

    (RUDN University Moscow Russia)

  • Kristina KEBURIA

    (RUDN University Moscow Russia)

  • Aleksandra KONEVA

    (RUDN University Moscow Russia)

  • Alexander SOLNTSEV

    (RUDN University Moscow Russia)

Abstract

The article analyses comparatively universal and regional mechanisms aimed at children s rights protection namely the 1996 Hague Convention and the 1993 Minsk Convention CIS Both legal instruments create measures for the children s best interests protection in international or cross border conflicts between the parents including such issues as recognition and enforcement of judgments concerning the children made by the competent judicial primarily and administrative authorities of one of the Member State within the territory of another This article argues that the 1996 Hague Convention has a wider range of opportunities to protect the children s rights than the 1993 Minsk Convention However 1993 Minsk Convention remains important as most of the CIS Member States are not yet Contracting Parties to the 1996 Hague Convention Russia however is a Contracting Party to both these Conventions although it has two separate Authorities to apply them In cases falling within either Convention it is argues that the Russian competent authorities should apply as per 1996 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties the later treaty

Suggested Citation

  • Aslan ABASHIDZE & Denis GUGUNSKIY & Kristina KEBURIA & Aleksandra KONEVA & Alexander SOLNTSEV, 2018. "Parental Responsibility and Children Protection The 1996 Hague Convention vs the 1993 Minsk Convention," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(3(33)), pages 1153-1163.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:3(33):p:1153-1163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:3(33):p:1153-1163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.