IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v9y2018i1p58-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical Aspects of the Formation of the Jury Trial in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya BUSHNAYA

    (Stavropol Branch of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Stavropol Russian Federation)

  • Elena PERSHINA

    (Stavropol Branch of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Stavropol Russian Federation)

  • Oksana KABAKOVA

    (Stavropol Branch of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Stavropol Russian Federation)

  • Galina STANKEVICH

    (Stavropol Branch of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Stavropol Russian Federation)

  • Anzhelika CHUNIKHA

    (Stavropol Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Stavropol Russian Federation)

Abstract

The relevance of the scientific analysis of the formation of the jury trial is due to the processes of updating the legal system which are extremely complex and contradictory in legal political and social aspects The reform of the judicial system affects the most important areas economic social political and legal ones Therefore it becomes necessary to comprehend the rich theoretical and practical historical experience of Russia The complexity of the processes of transformation of Russian statehood makes certain demands a judicial reform should be theoretically justified both in the context of the traditions of Russian legal doctrines which will allow proposing new approaches to the study of a legal doctrine and in the context of the general theory of law the methodology of which will allow using doctrines of the past for modern research of state legal phenomena The authors pursued the goal of revealing the features of the genesis of the jury trial in the conditions of the judicial reform of the second half of the nineteenth century Such cognition methods as historical comparative legal system structural logical formal legal ones have been used to achieve this goal During the study the authors made a conclusion that the historical aspect of the formation and development of the jury trial in Russia created prerequisites for analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of this form of legal proceedings in modern conditions The novelty of the stated area of research is that within its framework the problems and trends of interaction of Russian juridical science and the reform process in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries have been analyzed and this is of great practical and scientific importance The article focuses on considering the accumulated rich historical experience in order to identify the facets of the interface of juridical science and practice determine the extent of its influence on the government direction of reforms the ability to put the achieved level of gained knowledge to good use and respond to the social order of the time Modern jurisprudence plays the same role therefore it is necessary to identify the problems that Russian legal scholars faced in the nineteenth century in order to avoid them now and in future which is the aim of this research project Therefore the article is a comprehensive analysis of the trends of interaction and interdependence of juridical science and the process of in depth reforming of the Russian state in the second half of the nineteenth century by the example of the formation of the jury trial

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya BUSHNAYA & Elena PERSHINA & Oksana KABAKOVA & Galina STANKEVICH & Anzhelika CHUNIKHA, 2018. "Historical Aspects of the Formation of the Jury Trial in Russia," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 58-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:58-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.