IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v2y2011i1p78-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Common Management And Ecotourism Regulation Tragedy Or Triumph Of The Commons A Law And Economics Answer

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo SAM

    (Faculty of Economics LUISS Guido Carli University of Rome Italy)

Abstract

Since its origin ecotourism development has been at the centre of controversial and heated debates within the environmental and scientific society On one hand it has been considered as a model of responsible and sustainable tourism with the capacity to guarantee the conservation of the current biodiversity level and cultural identity to educate the tourists about preservation and to improve the economic activity and the standard of living of the populations affected On the other hand it has been criticized for actually being a mere instrument in the hands of capitalist and western firms to commercially exploit the natural resources available in the less developed countries Thus are the ecotourism projects more likely to be profitable and successful in territories where the common resources are controlled by the state or managed by private firms Considered the most frequent and spontaneous solution noticed in the ordinary daily life of the emerging countries meaning natural resources owned communally by local institutions does ecotourism impede or reinforce this management function of coordinating and controlling The empirical researches conducted in literature tried to answer to some of the above mentioned questions and offered the opportunity for a Law and Economics assessment of the problem related to the common pool resources

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo SAM, 2011. "The Relationship Between Common Management And Ecotourism Regulation Tragedy Or Triumph Of The Commons A Law And Economics Answer," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 78-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:78-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:78-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.