IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/stecon/v3y2014i1f3_1_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Composite Forecast For Realized Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac J. Faber
  • Kelsey Eargle

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a superior forecast for security volatility can be derived by finding a balance between historical data, implied volatility and an empirical implied distribution. Data are evaluated from option contracts and historical prices sampled on the first trading day of every month over a five year period from 2007 to 2012. These data are analyzed to determine the value of a weighted combination of the three sources of information and to uncover if this approach provides a forecast with a higher correlation to realized volatility. A linear optimization solution is formulated to determine the best possible composite volatility forecast. The results of the test show that there is statistically significant evidence in which the composite volatility forecast is preferred at a 95% confidence level over individual forecasts. With a better predictor for security volatility, this optimization process could be applied to the creation of portfolios that better meet investor risk preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac J. Faber & Kelsey Eargle, 2014. "An Improved Composite Forecast For Realized Volatility," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:stecon:v:3:y:2014:i:1:f:3_1_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JSEM%2fVol%203_1_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:stecon:v:3:y:2014:i:1:f:3_1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.