IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i6d10.1007_s11269-024-03758-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Crop Planning Optimisation Under Climate Change

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Randall

    (Bond University)

  • Karin Schiller

    (Bond University)

  • Andrew Lewis

    (Griffith University)

  • James Montgomery

    (University of Tasmania)

  • Muhammad Shahinur Alam

    (University of Tasmania)

Abstract

Optimising the use of natural resources for food production in the context of changing climate is an increasingly important issue. Optimisation techniques have been shown to be remarkably effective for planning problems, and tools regional planners and farmers can use to determine the viability of agricultural land use planning into the future. This paper systematically reviews the recent literature in this area and draws out the key emerging themes: few studies to date have explicitly incorporated climate projections into optimisation models; increased tension for water resources between stakeholders; and various agricultural production systems of complex versions of crop planning. From this review it can be seen that increasing concentration on the use of climate projection models within agriculturally-oriented optimisation processes is a necessity.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Randall & Karin Schiller & Andrew Lewis & James Montgomery & Muhammad Shahinur Alam, 2024. "A Systematic Review of Crop Planning Optimisation Under Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(6), pages 1867-1881, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03758-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03758-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03758-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03758-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03758-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.