IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i3d10.1007_s11269-023-03700-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Criteria Combination Approach to Determine Spatial Intervention Prioritization of Urban Flood Based on Source Tracking Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xinghua Wang

    (Xi’an University of Technology)

  • Jingming Hou

    (Xi’an University of Technology)

  • Guangyao Hu

    (China Water Resources and Hydropower Seventh Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd.)

  • Xujun Gao

    (Xi’an University of Technology)

  • Ruozhu Shen

    (Ningxia Capital Sponge City Construction & Development Co., Ltd.)

Abstract

Under the increasing stormwater events and consequent flood hazards, integrated flood management is increasingly becoming the most essential mitigation strategy to maximize the effectiveness of runoff reduction at the limitation of public budget. The research is aimed at proposed a multi-criteria combination approach to determine spatial intervention prioritization of urban flood based on source tracking analysis. First, Jinhua underpass catchment where an underpass is vulnerable to the impact of stormwater is selected as the case study. Second, source tracking analysis, which combining hydrodynamic model with rainfall-tracking model, is used to obtain the detailed dynamic information including water depth and contribution rate of different source areas. On the basis of source tracking analysis, from the perspective of source-process-end runoff volume management, five types of criteria are presented to evaluate the spatial intervention priority of each sub-area, entropy weight method is applied to combine useful information reflected by criteria 1–5 to form a comprehensive criterion identifying spatial priority of flood management. Notably, the results indicate that criteria extracted by source tracking analysis are highly effective in evaluating spatial priority for urban flood management. Specifically, criteria 1–5 estimate the importance in addressing runoff for different sub-areas from the view of source-progress-end, respectively. Moreover, the comprehensive criterion based on entropy weight method, an objective comprehensive evaluation method, can be used to guide the spatial prioritization of urban flood management for planners and decision-makers with respect to multi-perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinghua Wang & Jingming Hou & Guangyao Hu & Xujun Gao & Ruozhu Shen, 2024. "A Multi-Criteria Combination Approach to Determine Spatial Intervention Prioritization of Urban Flood Based on Source Tracking Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(3), pages 893-914, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03700-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03700-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03700-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-023-03700-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03700-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.