IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i2d10.1007_s11269-023-03695-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Subsurface Consequences of Dam Removal on Groundwater Storage and Hydrologic Niches in a Mountain Meadow Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore D. Eyster

    (University of British Columbia
    Present address: Hydrosimulatics Inc)

  • Mark S. Johnson

    (University of British Columbia
    University of British Columbia)

  • Sarah M. Yarnell

    (University of California Davis)

  • Christopher S. Lowry

    (University at Buffalo (SUNY))

Abstract

Dam removal is becoming more common as aging infrastructure deteriorates and people seek to restore the environmental conditions created by dams. Despite this growth in dam removals, studies analyzing effects of dam removal on meadow ecosystems are limited. Groundwater is an important and often overlooked component of hydrologic systems, particularly in the case of surface water manipulation like dam removal. A planned dam removal project at Van Norden Meadow, in the California Sierra Nevada Range at Donner Pass, was selected to quantify the impact of dam removal on shallow groundwater and the associated meadow system. Mountain meadows are inseparable from local hydrology and are a valuable resource in California’s Sierra Nevada range, providing an important source of water, supporting natural biotic communities, and serving as climate change refugia. Using MODFLOW, an open-source finite-difference groundwater modeling program, we established a baseline groundwater model for Van Norden Meadow and used it to assess potential impacts of dam removal on the subsurface water balance in relation to hydrologic niches to support plant communities. The model predicted a slight decrease of less than 0.9 m in the water table of the lower meadow below a recessional moraine, but no impact to the water table in the upper meadow. The areas adjacent to the dam along the reservoir footprint were found to be most at risk of losing wet meadow vegetation. The model also suggested dam removal led to a 3% increase in baseflow drainage below the meadow. This increase was balanced by an 8% decrease in evapotranspiration and a slight increase (0.9%) in the mobilization of stored groundwater. While no further actions following removal may be needed in the upper meadow, restoration activities, such as vegetation planting or channel filling, may be needed to offset the decrease in the water table and promote wet meadow habitats in some regions of the lower meadow. However, newly exposed areas in the reservoir footprint will promote hydric vegetation recruitment, suggesting a potential net increase in wet meadow vegetation after dam removal in Van Norden Meadow. More broadly, we found MODFLOW was suitable for modeling dam removal despite challenges with steep slopes and thin conductive layers over bedrock.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore D. Eyster & Mark S. Johnson & Sarah M. Yarnell & Christopher S. Lowry, 2024. "Analyzing the Subsurface Consequences of Dam Removal on Groundwater Storage and Hydrologic Niches in a Mountain Meadow Ecosystem," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(2), pages 717-731, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03695-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03695-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03695-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-023-03695-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03695-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.