IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v32y2023i4d10.1007_s11749-023-00881-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical models and the Benford hypothesis: a unified framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lucio Barabesi

    (University of Siena)

  • Andrea Cerioli

    (University of Parma)

  • Marco Marzio

    (“G. D’Annunzio” University)

Abstract

The Benford hypothesis is the statement that a random sample is made of realizations of an absolutely continuous random variable distributed according to Benford’s law. Its potential interest spans over many domains such as detection of financial frauds, verification of electoral processes and investigation of scientific measurements. Our aim is to provide a principled framework for the statistical evaluation of this statement. First, we study the probabilistic structure of many classical univariate models when they are framed in the space of the significand and we measure the closeness of each model to the Benford hypothesis. We then obtain two asymptotically equivalent and powerful tests. We show that the proposed test statistics are invariant under scale transformation of the data, a crucial requirement when compliance to the Benford hypothesis is used to corroborate scientific theories. The empirical advantage of the proposed tests is shown through an extensive simulation study. Applications to astrophysical and hydrological data also motivate the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucio Barabesi & Andrea Cerioli & Marco Marzio, 2023. "Statistical models and the Benford hypothesis: a unified framework," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(4), pages 1479-1507, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:32:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11749-023-00881-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-023-00881-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11749-023-00881-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-023-00881-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:32:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11749-023-00881-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.