IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/svcbiz/v17y2023i4d10.1007_s11628-023-00545-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring robot service quality priorities for different levels of intimacy with service

Author

Listed:
  • Ai-Hsuan Chiang

    (Ming Chuan University)

  • Szu-Yu Chou

    (Ming Chuan University)

Abstract

The influence of intimacy between humans and service robots on service quality has garnered significant attention. Applying the Mehrabian–Russell environmental psychology model, this study collected 591 valid responses from users of robots with different levels of intimacy and then used the TOPSIS technique to rank the importance of service quality. The results show, first, that high-intimacy service robots have better service quality performance. Second, for both high and low-intimacy service robots, tangibility and responsiveness are the two most important service quality dimensions. Third, the different levels of robot intimacy affect customers’ ranking of the other three service quality dimensions (empathy, reliability, and assurance). This research enables scholars and professionals to comprehend the influence of robot intimacy on robot service quality, thereby facilitating successful robot service implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ai-Hsuan Chiang & Szu-Yu Chou, 2023. "Exploring robot service quality priorities for different levels of intimacy with service," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(4), pages 913-935, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:17:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11628-023-00545-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11628-023-00545-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11628-023-00545-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11628-023-00545-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:17:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11628-023-00545-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.