IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v60y2019i4d10.1007_s00362-017-0875-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimators of parameters of a mixture of three multinomial distributions based on simple majority results

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Saldanha Morais

    (Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Roberto da Costa Quinino

    (Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Emilio Suyama

    (Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Linda Lee Ho

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

For assessing the precision of measurement systems that classify items dichotomically with the possibility of repeated ratings, the maximum likelihood method is commonly used to evaluate misclassification probabilities. However, a computationally simpler and more intuitive approach is the method of simple majority. In this approach, each item is labelled as conforming if the majority of repeated classification outcomes are conforming. A previous study has indicated that this technique yields estimators that have a lower mean squared error than but the same asymptotic properties as the corresponding maximum likelihood estimators. However, there are circumstances in which the use of measurement systems with a wider scale of responses is necessary. In this paper, we propose estimators based on simple majority results for evaluating the classification errors of measurement systems that rate items in a trichotomous domain. We investigate their properties and compare their performance with that of maximum likelihood estimators. We focus on the context in which the true quality states of the objects cannot be determined. The simple majority procedure is modelled using a mixture of three multinomial distributions. The proposed estimators are shown to be a competitive alternative because they offer closed-form expressions and demonstrate a performance similar to that of maximum likelihood estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Saldanha Morais & Roberto da Costa Quinino & Emilio Suyama & Linda Lee Ho, 2019. "Estimators of parameters of a mixture of three multinomial distributions based on simple majority results," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1283-1316, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:60:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-017-0875-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-017-0875-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-017-0875-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-017-0875-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Mast, Jeroen, 2007. "Agreement and Kappa-Type Indices," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 148-153, May.
    2. Hironori Fujisawa & Shizue Izumi, 2000. "Inference about Misclassification Probabilities from Repeated Binary Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 706-711, September.
    3. Roberto Quinino & Linda Ho & Emílio Suyama, 2013. "Alternative estimator for the parameters of a mixture of two binomial distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 47-69, February.
    4. Norman L. Johnson & Samuel Kotz, 1988. "Estimation from binomial data with classifiers of known and unknown imperfections," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 147-156, February.
    5. T. Pham-Gia & N. Turkhan, 2005. "Bayesian decision criteria in the presence of noises under quadratic and absolute value loss functions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 247-266, April.
    6. Jian Li & Fugee Tsung & Changliang Zou, 2014. "Multivariate binomial/multinomial control chart," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 526-542.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Quinino & Linda Ho & Emílio Suyama, 2013. "Alternative estimator for the parameters of a mixture of two binomial distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 47-69, February.
    2. Matthijs Warrens, 2010. "Inequalities Between Kappa and Kappa-Like Statistics for k×k Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 176-185, March.
    3. Matthijs Warrens, 2010. "A Formal Proof of a Paradox Associated with Cohen’s Kappa," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 27(3), pages 322-332, November.
    4. Matthijs J. Warrens, 2014. "Power Weighted Versions of Bennett, Alpert, and Goldstein’s," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, December.
    5. Matthijs Warrens, 2010. "Inequalities between multi-rater kappas," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 4(4), pages 271-286, December.
    6. Sotirios Bersimis & Athanasios Sachlas & Philippe Castagliola, 2017. "Controlling Bivariate Categorical Processes using Scan Rules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1135-1149, December.
    7. Shengjin Gan & Su-Fen Yang & Li-Pang Chen, 2023. "A New EWMA Control Chart for Monitoring Multinomial Proportions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Airat Bekmetjev & Dirk VanBruggen & Brian McLellan & Benjamin DeWinkle & Eric Lunderberg & Nathan Tintle, 2012. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Reclassification Sampling for Prevalence Estimation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    9. Joris Knoben & Leon A. G. Oerlemans & Annefleur R. Krijkamp & Keith G. Provan, 2018. "What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 471-488, June.
    10. Amalia Vanacore & Maria Sole Pellegrino, 2019. "Checking quality of sensory data via an agreement-based approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2545-2556, September.
    11. Beavers, Daniel P. & Stamey, James D., 2012. "Bayesian sample size determination for binary regression with a misclassified covariate and no gold standard," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2574-2582.
    12. Amalia Vanacore & Maria Sole Pellegrino, 2019. "How Reliable are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)? A Study to Test Student’s Reproducibility and Repeatability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 77-89, November.
    13. Benchong Li & Liya Fu, 2018. "Exact test of goodness of fit for binomial distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 851-860, September.
    14. Simon Lysdahlgaard & Sandi Baressi Šegota & Søren Hess & Ronald Antulov & Martin Weber Kusk & Zlatan Car, 2023. "Quality Assessment Assistance of Lateral Knee X-rays: A Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    15. C. Y. Wang & Yijian Huang & Edward C. Chao & Marjorie K. Jeffcoat, 2008. "Expected Estimating Equations for Missing Data, Measurement Error, and Misclassification, with Application to Longitudinal Nonignorable Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 85-95, March.
    16. Guangchao Feng, 2013. "Factors affecting intercoder reliability: a Monte Carlo experiment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2959-2982, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:60:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-017-0875-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.