IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v26y2017i4d10.1007_s10260-017-0385-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribution-dependent and distribution-free confidence intervals for the variance

Author

Listed:
  • Brent D. Burch

    (Northern Arizona University)

Abstract

Finding an interval estimation procedure for the variance of a population that achieves a specified confidence level can be problematic. If the distribution of the population is known, then a distribution-dependent interval for the variance can be obtained by considering a power transformation of the sample variance. Simulation results suggest that this method produces intervals for the variance that maintain the nominal probability of coverage for a wide variety of distributions. If the underlying distribution is unknown, then the power itself must be estimated prior to forming the endpoints of the interval. The result is a distribution-free confidence interval estimator of the population variance. Simulation studies indicate that the power transformation method compares favorably to the logarithmic transformation method and the nonparametric bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method for moderately sized samples. However, two applications, one in forestry and the other in health sciences, demonstrate that no single method is best for all scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent D. Burch, 2017. "Distribution-dependent and distribution-free confidence intervals for the variance," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 629-648, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0385-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-017-0385-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-017-0385-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-017-0385-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George R. Terrell, 2003. "The Wilson--Hilferty transformation is locally saddlepoint," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 445-453, June.
    2. An, Lihua & Ahmed, S. Ejaz, 2008. "Improving the performance of kurtosis estimator," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2669-2681, January.
    3. Bonett, Douglas G., 2006. "Approximate confidence interval for standard deviation of nonnormal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 775-782, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burch, Brent D., 2011. "Assessing the performance of normal-based and REML-based confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1018-1028, February.
    2. Haiyan Wang & Bo Tong & Huaiyu Zhang & Xukun Li, 2017. "New two-sample tests for skewed populations and their connection to theoretical power of Bootstrap-t test," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(3), pages 661-683, September.
    3. Cojbasic, Vesna & Tomovic, Andrija, 2007. "Nonparametric confidence intervals for population variance of one sample and the difference of variances of two samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5562-5578, August.
    4. Peter H. Westfall, 2014. "Kurtosis as Peakedness, 1905-2014. R.I.P," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 191-195, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0385-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.