IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v11y2019i2d10.1007_s12561-019-09241-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiating Between Walking and Stair Climbing Using Raw Accelerometry Data

Author

Listed:
  • William F. Fadel

    (Indiana University)

  • Jacek K. Urbanek

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Steven R. Albertson

    (Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis)

  • Xiaochun Li

    (Indiana University)

  • Andrea K. Chomistek

    (Indiana University Bloomington)

  • Jaroslaw Harezlak

    (Indiana University Bloomington)

Abstract

Wearable accelerometers provide an objective measure of human physical activity. They record high-frequency unlabeled three-dimensional time series data. We extract meaningful features from the raw accelerometry data and based on them develop and evaluate a classification method for the detection of walking and its subclasses, i.e., level walking, descending stairs, and ascending stairs. Our methodology is tested on a sample of 32 middle-aged subjects for whom we extracted features based on the Fourier and wavelet transforms. We build subject-specific and group-level classification models utilizing a tree-based methodology. We evaluate the effects of sensor location and tuning parameters on the classification accuracy of the tree models. In the group-level classification setting, we propose a robust feature inter-subject normalization and evaluate its performance compared to unnormalized data. The overall classification accuracy for the three activities at the subject-specific level was on average 87.6%, with the ankle-worn accelerometers showing the best performance with an average accuracy 90.5%. At the group-level, the average overall classification accuracy for the three activities using the normalized features was 80.2% compared to 72.3% for the unnormalized features. In summary, a framework is provided for better use and feature extraction from raw accelerometry data to differentiate among different walking modalities as well as considerations for study design.

Suggested Citation

  • William F. Fadel & Jacek K. Urbanek & Steven R. Albertson & Xiaochun Li & Andrea K. Chomistek & Jaroslaw Harezlak, 2019. "Differentiating Between Walking and Stair Climbing Using Raw Accelerometry Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 334-354, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:11:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-019-09241-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-019-09241-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-019-09241-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-019-09241-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo Xiao & Bing He & Annemarie Koster & Paolo Caserotti & Brittney Lange-Maia & Nancy W. Glynn & Tamara B. Harris & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2016. "Movement prediction using accelerometers in a human population," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 513-524, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Karas & Jiawei Bai & Marcin StrÄ…czkiewicz & Jaroslaw Harezlak & Nancy W. Glynn & Tamara Harris & Vadim Zipunnikov & Ciprian Crainiceanu & Jacek K. Urbanek, 2019. "Accelerometry Data in Health Research: Challenges and Opportunities," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 210-237, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:11:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-019-09241-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.