IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v79y2006i3p437-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Reconstruction through a Modified Focus Group Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Lindsay
  • Anita Hubley

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Lindsay & Anita Hubley, 2006. "Conceptual Reconstruction through a Modified Focus Group Methodology," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 437-454, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:79:y:2006:i:3:p:437-454
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-005-5075-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-005-5075-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-005-5075-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimberly Horn & Sallie Beth Johnson & Sofía Rincón-Gallardo Patiño & Kevin Krost & Tiffany Gray & Craig Dearfield & Chenguang Du & Debra Bernat, 2021. "Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Elena VACULOVSCHI, 2023. "Methodological Aspects And Results Of Conducting Focus Group Interviews In The Study Of The Opinion Of Children Left Behind By Labor Migration," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 9(1), pages 60-69, June.
    3. Havelka, Douglas & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2013. "Internal information technology audit process quality: Theory development using structured group processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 165-192.
    4. Achim Goerres & Katrin Prinzen, 2012. "Can We Improve the Measurement of Attitudes Towards the Welfare State? A Constructive Critique of Survey Instruments with Evidence from Focus Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 515-534, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:79:y:2006:i:3:p:437-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.