IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v172y2024i1d10.1007_s11205-024-03306-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Economic Inequality Is Negatively Associated with Subjective Well-being through Status Anxiety and Social Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Efraín García-Sánchez

    (University of Granada
    Stanford University)

  • Juan Matamoros-Lima

    (University of Granada)

  • Eva Moreno-Bella

    (National University of Distance Education (UNED))

  • Davide Melita

    (Jagiellonian University)

  • Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez

    (Universidad de Salamanca)

  • Juan Diego García-Castro

    (Universidad de Costa Rica
    Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (COES))

  • Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón

    (University of Granada)

  • Guillermo B. Willis

    (University of Granada)

Abstract

The relationship between economic inequality and subjective well-being has produced mixed results in the literature. Conflicting evidence may be due to overlooking the role of psychosocial processes that translate socioeconomic conditions into subjective evaluations. We argue that perceiving high economic inequality erodes social capital, undermining people’s subjective well-being. We rely on the Psychosocial Model of Perceived Economic Inequality and Subjective Well-Being (PEISW), which posits that perceived economic inequality negatively affects subjective well-being by increasing status anxiety and decreasing social trust. Furthermore, these indirect effects from perceived inequality to subjective well-being will be moderated by system-justifying ideologies. The present article provides the first empirical test of this model using a national survey from Spain (N = 1,536). We confirmed that perceived economic inequality is negatively associated with well-being. We also found that perceived economic inequality had an indirect negative effect on subjective well-being via increasing status anxiety and reducing social trust. We found no evidence that system-justifying ideologies (i.e., social dominance orientation) moderated the association between perceived economic inequality and subjective well-being. We discuss that perceived economic inequality is crucial to understanding the link between economic inequality and subjective well-being and elaborate on the role of psychosocial mechanisms that promote competition and undermine social cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Efraín García-Sánchez & Juan Matamoros-Lima & Eva Moreno-Bella & Davide Melita & Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez & Juan Diego García-Castro & Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón & Guillermo B. Willis, 2024. "Perceived Economic Inequality Is Negatively Associated with Subjective Well-being through Status Anxiety and Social Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 239-260, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:172:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03306-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03306-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-024-03306-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-024-03306-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:172:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03306-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.