IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v171y2024i3d10.1007_s11205-023-03279-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Urban Shrinkage Inhibit Residents' Welfare? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural Development in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Ding

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Guizhou Collaborative Innovation Center of Green Finance and Ecological Environment Protection
    Green Finance Innovation and Practice Center
    Guizhou University of Finance and Economics)

  • Yuqi Zhu

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Green Finance Innovation and Practice Center)

  • Siwei Shen

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Guizhou University of Finance and Economics)

  • Linyu Du

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Guizhou University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jun Fu

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Green Finance Innovation and Practice Center)

  • Jian Zou

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Green Finance Innovation and Practice Center)

  • Lina Peng

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
    Green Finance Innovation and Practice Center)

Abstract

Eliminating poverty and improving welfare are the value pursuit of global development. Based on the panel data of prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2020, the path relationship among urban shrinkage, urban–rural development, and residents' welfare growth is empirically tested. The heterogeneity of urban shrinkage affecting residents' welfare are further revealed from multidimensional perspectives such as public financial pressure, attention to ageing cause, provincial capital welfare spillover, land expansion, and geographic differences. The research shows that: (1) Urban shrinkage not only directly inhibit residents' welfare, but also curb the improvement of residents' welfare through widening urban–rural income gap and strengthening urban–rural dual economic structure. (2) The higher the public financial pressure and the attention to the aging cause, the more obvious the inhibitory effect of urban shrinkage on the welfare. The welfare spillover of provincial capital cities show a distinct characteristics of distance attenuation. (3) The inhibitory effect of urban shrinkage on welfare growth is stronger in cities with a higher degree of land expansion. The inhibitory effect of the widening urban–rural income gap on welfare growth presents a V-shaped trend with land expansion. (4) The overall impact of urban shrinkage, urban–rural income gap, and urban–rural dual economic structure on residents' welfare is negative, and the spatiotemporal heterogeneity is significant. The impact of urban shrinkage on residents' welfare in seven cities of Hebei and Shandong province is at the stage of turning from negative to positive during the study period.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Ding & Yuqi Zhu & Siwei Shen & Linyu Du & Jun Fu & Jian Zou & Lina Peng, 2024. "Does Urban Shrinkage Inhibit Residents' Welfare? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural Development in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 847-876, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:171:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-023-03279-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-023-03279-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-023-03279-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-023-03279-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:171:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-023-03279-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.