When is Condorcet's Jury Theorem valid?
AbstractExisting proofs of Condorcet's Jury Theorem formulate only sufficient conditions for its validity. This paper provides necessary and sufficient conditions for Condorcet's Jury Theorem. The framework of the analysis is the case of heterogeneous decisional competence, but the independence assumption is maintained.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Springer in its journal Social Choice and Welfare.
Volume (Year): 15 (1998)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Note: Received: 23 January 1997/Accepted: 8 March 1997
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00355/index.htm
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Gersbach, Hans, 2005.
"Democratic Mechanisms: Double Majority Rules and Flexible Agenda Costs,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
5013, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Hans Gersbach, 2002. "Democratic Mechanisms: Double Majority Rules and Flexible Agenda Costs," CESifo Working Paper Series 749, CESifo Group Munich.
- Santiago Oliveros, 2013. "Aggregation of endogenous information in large elections," Economics Discussion Papers 733, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
- Dietrich, Franz, 2008. "The Premises of Condorcet's Jury Theorem Are Not Simultaneously Justified," Research Memoranda 012, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.
- Christian List, 2003. "What is special about the proportion? A research report on special majority voting and the classical Condorcet jury theorem," Public Economics 0304004, EconWPA.
- Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2002.
"A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence,"
2002-W23, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Christian List & Franz Dietrich, 2002. "A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have The Same Evidence," Economics Series Working Papers 2002-W23, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2004. "A model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence," Open Access publications from Maastricht University urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-15422, Maastricht University.
- Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2008.
"Condorcet Jury Theorem: The Dependent Case,"
Discussion Paper Series
dp477, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Osherson, Daniel & Vardi, Moshe Y., 2006. "Aggregating disparate estimates of chance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 148-173, July.
- Minoru Kitahara & Yohei Sekiguchi, 2006. "Aggregate Accuracy under Majority Rule with Heterogeneous Cost Functions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(25), pages 1-8.
- Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2009. "On Bayesian-Nash Equilibria Satisfying the Condorcet Jury Theorem: The Dependent Case," Discussion Paper Series dp527, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Matteo Triossi, 2008. "Costly information acquisition. Part I: better to toss a coin?," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 68, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn) or (Christopher F Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.