IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v127y2022i5d10.1007_s11192-022-04331-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Music information visualization and classical composers discovery: an application of network graphs, multidimensional scaling, and support vector machines

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Georges

    (University of Ottawa)

  • Aylin Seckin

    (Bilgi University)

Abstract

This article illustrates different information visualization techniques applied to a database of classical composers and visualizes both the macrocosm of the Common Practice Period and the microcosms of twentieth century classical music. It uses data on personal (composer-to-composer) musical influences to generate and analyze network graphs. Data on style influences and composers ‘ecological’ data are then combined to composer-to-composer musical influences to build a similarity/distance matrix, and a multidimensional scaling analysis is used to locate the relative position of composers on a map while preserving the pairwise distances. Finally, a support-vector machines algorithm is used to generate classification maps. This article falls into the realm of an experiment in music education, not musicology. The ultimate objective is to explore parts of the classical music heritage and stimulate interest in discovering composers. In an age offering either inculcation through lists of prescribed composers and compositions to explore, or music recommendation algorithms that automatically propose works to listen to next, the analysis illustrates an alternative path that might promote the active rather than passive discovery of composers and their music in a less restrictive way than inculcation through prescription.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Georges & Aylin Seckin, 2022. "Music information visualization and classical composers discovery: an application of network graphs, multidimensional scaling, and support vector machines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2277-2311, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04331-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04331-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04331-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-022-04331-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Georges & Ngoc Nguyen, 2019. "Visualizing music similarity: clustering and mapping 500 classical music composers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 975-1003, September.
    2. Leo Egghe & Loet Leydesdorff, 2009. "The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(5), pages 1027-1036, May.
    3. Patrick Georges, 2017. "Western classical music development: a statistical analysis of composers similarity, differentiation and evolution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 21-53, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    2. Georg Groh & Christoph Fuchs, 2011. "Multi-modal social networks for modeling scientific fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 569-590, November.
    3. Th I Götz & G Lahmer & V Strnad & Ch Bert & B Hensel & A M Tomé & E W Lang, 2017. "A tool to automatically analyze electromagnetic tracking data from high dose rate brachytherapy of breast cancer patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Masih Hosseinzadeh & Hossein Mashhadimoslem & Farid Maleki & Ali Elkamel, 2022. "Prediction of Solid Conversion Process in Direct Reduction Iron Oxide Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Loet Leydesdorff, 2011. "“Structuration” by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among structural components in networks of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 499-520, August.
    6. Raamesh Deshpande & Benjamin VanderSluis & Chad L Myers, 2013. "Comparison of Profile Similarity Measures for Genetic Interaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Wolfram, Dietmar & Zhao, Yuehua, 2014. "A comparison of journal similarity across six disciplines using citing discipline analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 840-853.
    8. Cristian Colliander & Per Ahlgren, 2012. "Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 675-685, February.
    9. Frank Bakker & Iina Hellsten, 2013. "Capturing Online Presence: Hyperlinks and Semantic Networks in Activist Group Websites on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 807-823, December.
    10. Sisman, S. & Aydinoglu, A.C., 2022. "Improving performance of mass real estate valuation through application of the dataset optimization and Spatially Constrained Multivariate Clustering Analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Manuel Castriotta & Maria Chiara Guardo, 2016. "Disentangling the automotive technology structure: a patent co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 819-837, May.
    12. Leydesdorff, Loet & Welbers, Kasper, 2011. "The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 469-475.
    13. Brian L. Egleston & Tian Bai & Richard J. Bleicher & Stanford J. Taylor & Michael H. Lutz & Slobodan Vucetic, 2021. "Statistical inference for natural language processing algorithms with a demonstration using type 2 diabetes prediction from electronic health record notes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1089-1100, September.
    14. Chen, Lixin, 2017. "Do patent citations indicate knowledge linkage? The evidence from text similarities between patents and their citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 63-79.
    15. Muhammad Farhan Jalil & Azlan Ali & Rashidah Kamarulzaman, 2023. "The influence of psychological capital and social capital on women entrepreneurs’ intentions: the mediating role of attitude," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Dong, Keqiang & Long, Linan & Zhang, Hong & Gao, You, 2018. "The mutual information based minimum spanning tree to detect and evaluate dependencies between aero-engine gas path system variables," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 248-253.
    17. Shuqing Li & Ying Sun & Dagobert Soergel, 2015. "A new method for automatically constructing domain-oriented term taxonomy based on weighted word co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 1023-1042, June.
    18. Patrick Georges & Ngoc Nguyen, 2019. "Visualizing music similarity: clustering and mapping 500 classical music composers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 975-1003, September.
    19. Leydesdorff, Loet & Rafols, Ismael, 2012. "Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 318-332.
    20. Viergutz, Tim & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2018. "The use of hybrid scientometric clustering for systematic literature reviews in business and economics," DARE Discussion Papers 1804, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04331-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.