IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v84y2016i1d10.1007_s11134-016-9481-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal control of queueing systems with non-collaborating servers

Author

Listed:
  • Tuğçe Işık

    (Clemson University)

  • Sigrún Andradóttir

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Hayriye Ayhan

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)

Abstract

We study the dynamic server allocation problem for tandem queueing systems with an equal number of stations and servers. The servers are flexible, yet non-collaborative, so that at most one server can work at a station at any time. The objective is to maximize the long-run average throughput. We show that if each server is the fastest at one station, then a dedicated server assignment policy is optimal for systems of arbitrary size and with general service requirement distributions. Otherwise, the optimal policy is more complex as servers must divide their time between stations. For Markovian systems with two stations and two servers, we characterize the optimal policy completely. For larger Markovian systems, we use our results for two-station systems to propose four heuristic server assignment policies and provide computational results that show that our heuristics are near-optimal. We also compare collaborative and non-collaborative settings to evaluate the benefits of dynamic server allocation, as opposed to collaboration, in systems with flexible servers. We conclude that the loss in the long-run average throughput due to lack of collaboration is mitigated by the similarity of the tasks in the system, and cross-training can still be beneficial in non-collaborative systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuğçe Işık & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2016. "Optimal control of queueing systems with non-collaborating servers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 79-110, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9481-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-016-9481-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-016-9481-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-016-9481-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald G. Brown & Arthur M. Geoffrion & Gordon H. Bradley, 1981. "Production and Sales Planning with Limited Shared Tooling at the Key Operation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 247-259, March.
    2. Avishai Mandelbaum & Alexander L. Stolyar, 2004. "Scheduling Flexible Servers with Convex Delay Costs: Heavy-Traffic Optimality of the Generalized cμ-Rule," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 836-855, December.
    3. Sennott, Linn I. & Van Oyen, Mark P. & Iravani, Seyed M.R., 2006. "Optimal dynamic assignment of a flexible worker on an open production line with specialists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 541-566, April.
    4. Ramesh Arumugam & Maria Mayorga & Kevin Taaffe, 2009. "Inventory based allocation policies for flexible servers in serial systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2003. "Dynamic Server Allocation for Queueing Networks with Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 952-968, December.
    6. Wallace J. Hopp & Eylem Tekin & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2004. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    7. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2005. "Throughput Maximization for Tandem Lines with Two Stations and Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 516-531, June.
    8. John J. Bartholdi & Donald D. Eisenstein, 1996. "A Production Line that Balances Itself," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 21-34, February.
    9. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2001. "Server Assignment Policies for Maximizing the Steady-State Throughput of Finite Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1421-1439, October.
    10. Maria Mayorga & Kevin Taaffe & Ramesh Arumugam, 2009. "Allocating flexible servers in serial systems with switching costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 231-242, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristen Gardner & Rhonda Righter, 2022. "The cost of collaboration," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 7-40, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2012. "Flexible Servers in Understaffed Tandem Lines," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 761-777, July.
    2. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2007. "Compensating for Failures with Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 753-768, August.
    3. Tuğçe Işık & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2022. "Dynamic Control of Non‐Collaborative Workers When Reassignment Is Costly," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1332-1352, March.
    4. Peng Wang & Kai Pan & Zhenzhen Yan & Yun Fong Lim, 2022. "Managing Stochastic Bucket Brigades on Discrete Work Stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 358-373, January.
    5. Yun Fong Lim & Bingnan Lu & Rowan Wang & Wenjia Zhang, 2020. "Flexibly Serving A Finite Number of Heterogeneous Jobs in A Tandem System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1431-1447, June.
    6. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    7. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2010. "Robustness of efficient server assignment policies to service time distributions in finite‐buffered lines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(6), pages 563-582, September.
    8. Emmett J. Lodree & Nezih Altay & Robert A. Cook, 2019. "Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 411-442, December.
    9. Yi‐Chun Tsai & Nilay Tanık Argon, 2008. "Dynamic server assignment policies for assembly‐type queues with flexible servers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 234-251, April.
    10. Sennott, Linn I. & Van Oyen, Mark P. & Iravani, Seyed M.R., 2006. "Optimal dynamic assignment of a flexible worker on an open production line with specialists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 541-566, April.
    11. Down, Douglas G. & Karakostas, George, 2008. "Maximizing throughput in queueing networks with limited flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 98-112, May.
    12. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2005. "Throughput Maximization for Tandem Lines with Two Stations and Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 516-531, June.
    13. Dimitrios G. Pandelis, 2014. "Optimal control of noncollaborative servers in two‐stage tandem queueing systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(6), pages 435-446, September.
    14. Seyed M. Iravani & Mark P. Van Oyen & Katharine T. Sims, 2005. "Structural Flexibility: A New Perspective on the Design of Manufacturing and Service Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 151-166, February.
    15. Aili (Alice) Zou & Douglas G. Down, 2018. "Asymptotically Maximal Throughput in Tandem Systems with Flexible and Dedicated Servers," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-15, October.
    16. S.M.R. Iravani & J.A. Buzacott & M.J.M. Posner, 2005. "A robust policy for serial agile production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 58-73, February.
    17. Cong Shi & Yehua Wei & Yuan Zhong, 2019. "Process Flexibility for Multiperiod Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1300-1320, September.
    18. Wallace J. Hopp & Seyed M.R. Iravani & Biying Shou & Robert Lien, 2009. "Design and control of agile automated CONWIP production lines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 42-56, February.
    19. Nilay Tanık Argon & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2017. "Pooling in tandem queueing networks with non-collaborative servers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 345-377, December.
    20. Gabriel Zayas-Cabán & Jingui Xie & Linda V. Green & Mark E. Lewis, 2016. "Dynamic control of a tandem system with abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 279-293, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9481-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.