IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i2d10.1007_s11135-017-0552-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of mobile learning for visually impaired learners school in tolerance education contents

Author

Listed:
  • Umu Akcil

    (Near East University)

Abstract

Mobile learning technologies become alternative way of learning to foster knowledge creation, skills development for learners. Especially in gaining open, equality and access in education, there is an intensified need to consider tolerance education content. Using mobile learning technologies and having particular skills to use mobile technologies for visually impaired adult learners have been investigated in this study. Mix method was employed and questionnaire and at the same time semi-structured interviews provide large amount of data to reveal challenges and possible strategies in enhancing mobile learning technologies for visually impaired adult learners. Thirty nine adult learners become part of this action research voluntary basis. The research reveals the practice of mobile learning technologies and its challenges in developing country and also shows how visually impaired learners need mobile learning and education to become digital citizen within the society. In this respect, using mobile technologies and having knowledge, skills for practicing mobile technologies need to be considered in detail for visually impaired adult learners based on proposed strategies. It is revealed that tolerance education content is important and can be diffused through the impact of technology and management. For further studies, contemporary mobile technology applications can be developed and tested with proposed model as underlined in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Umu Akcil, 2018. "The use of mobile learning for visually impaired learners school in tolerance education contents," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 969-982, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0552-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0552-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0552-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-017-0552-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Parkin & Nicola Smithies, 2012. "Accounting for the Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired People in Public Realm Design," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 135-149.
    2. Taeil Kim & Soogwan Doh, 2006. "Analysis of the Digital Divide Between Disabled and Non-Disabled People in South Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 231-261, December.
    3. Soogwan Doh & Roger R Stough, 2010. "Analysis of the Impact of the Perceived Usefulness of ICT on the Digital Divide Between Disabled and Non-Disabled People in South Korea," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 53-70, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Özge Sakallı & Ahmed Tlili & Fahriye Altınay & Ceren Karaatmaca & Zehra Altınay & Gökmen Dağlı, 2021. "The Role of Tolerance Education in Diversity Management: A Cultural Historical Activity Theory Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gavin R. Jenkins & Hon K. Yuen & Laura K. Vogtle, 2015. "Experience of Multisensory Environments in Public Space among People with Visual Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Umut Akcil & Çimen Ünlücan, 2018. "The problems disabled people face in mobile and web based e-learning phases in a developing country," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 1201-1210, December.
    3. Laura N. Cushley & Neil Galway & Katie Curran & Tunde Peto, 2022. "Navigating the Unseen City: Town Planners, Architects, Ophthalmic Professionals, and Charity Opinions on Navigating of the Built Environment with a Visual Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Liao, Shu-Chun & Chou, Tzu-Chuan & Huang, Chen-Hao, 2022. "Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Ullmann, Heidi & Jones, Francis & Williams, Robert Crane & Williams, Deirdre, 2018. "Information and communications technologies for the inclusion and empowerment of persons with disabilities in Latin America and the Caribbean," Documentos de Proyectos 43744, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Hyesun Hwang & Su‐Jung Nam, 2021. "Social media use and subjective well‐being among middle‐aged consumers in Korea: Mediation model of social capital moderated by disability," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1352-1372, December.
    7. Pimkamol Mattsson & Maria Johansson & Mai Almén & Thorbjörn Laike & Elizabeth Marcheschi & Agneta Ståhl, 2020. "Improved Usability of Pedestrian Environments After Dark for People with Vision Impairment: an Intervention Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Thays A. Oliveira & Yuri B. Gabrich & Helena Ramalhinho & Miquel Oliver & Miri W. Cohen & Luiz S. Ochi & Serigne Gueye & Fábio Protti & Alysson A. Pinto & Diógenes V. M. Ferreira & Igor M. Coelho & Vi, 2020. "Mobility, Citizens, Innovation and Technology in Digital and Smart Cities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Brian L Due & Simon Bierring Lange, 2019. "Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(4), pages 475-495, December.
    10. Seolhee Lee & Youngsun Lee & Eunhye Park, 2023. "Sustainable Vocational Preparation for Adults with Disabilities: A Metaverse-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0552-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.