IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i1d10.1007_s11135-017-0468-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposal for the analysis of the relational dimension in the interview techniques: a pilot study on in-depth interviews and focus groups

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Cataldi

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

Several current scholars of sociological methodology put increasing emphasis on the centrality of the relational dimension in the process of collecting information. But what are the interactional mechanisms involved in the construction of data? In order to answer this question, this study will use the relational analysis, applying it to two specific families of interrogation techniques: the focus groups and the in-depth interviews. Therefore, a pilot study is conducted analysing a small number of focus group transcriptions and in-depth interviews on the base of the Interaction Process Analysis (Bales in Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1950), a classic of social psychology. The aim of the pilot study is to understand whether and what can be the sense of considering the interview (involving two or more subjects) as a social interaction, identifying the relational characteristics of the two techniques taken into analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Cataldi, 2018. "A proposal for the analysis of the relational dimension in the interview techniques: a pilot study on in-depth interviews and focus groups," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 295-312, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0468-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0468-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0468-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-017-0468-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivana Acocella, 2012. "The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1125-1136, June.
    2. David Riesman & Mark Benney, 1956. "Asking and Answering," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29, pages 225-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Hiba Bawadi & Sara Elshami & Ahmed Awaisu & Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi & Shuja Ashfaq & Banan Mukhalalati, 2023. "A review of technical and quality assessment considerations of audio-visual and web-conferencing focus groups in qualitative health research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Price promises, trust deficits and energy justice: Public perceptions of hydrogen homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Eftychia Kessopoulou & Katerina Gotzamani & Styliani Xanthopoulou & George Tsiotras, 2023. "Conceptualizing and Validating a Model for Benchlearning Capability: Results from the Greek Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Tiberiu Foris & Alina Simona Tecău & Camelia-Cristina Dragomir & Diana Foris, 2022. "The Start-Up Manager in Times of Crisis: Challenges and Solutions for Increasing the Resilience of Companies and Sustainable Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Sara Chinnasamy* & Norminaliza Mohamed Azmi, 2018. "Malaysian 14th General Election: Young Voters & Rising Political Participation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 125-138:4.
    7. Consuelo Cruz-Riveros & Alfonso Urzúa & Gustavo Macaya-Aguirre & Báltica Cabieses, 2022. "How Do Health Teams Perceive International Migrant Users of Primary Care?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Tiina Kymäläinen & Anu Seisto & Roosa Malila, 2021. "Generation Z Food Waste, Diet and Consumption Habits: A Finnish Social Design Study with Future Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Sayeda Sabrina Ali & Md. Raju Ahmad & Jalal Uddin Mohammad Shoaib & Mohammad Aliuzzaman Sheik & Mohammad Imam Hoshain & Rebecca L. Hall & Katrina A. Macintosh & Paul N. Williams, 2021. "Pandemic or Environmental Socio-Economic Stressors Which Have Greater Impact on Food Security in the Barishal Division of Bangladesh: Initial Perspectives from Agricultural Officers and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Semaan, Rania W. & Lindsay, Val & Williams, Paul & Ashill, Nick, 2019. "The influence of gender roles in the drivers of luxury consumption for women: Insights from the gulf region," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 165-175.
    11. Orlaith Cormican & Maura Dowling, 2018. "Living with relapsed myeloma: Symptoms and self‐care strategies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1713-1721, April.
    12. Daniela Stelzmann & Sara Jahnke & Laura F. Kuhle, 2022. "Media Coverage of Pedophilia and Its Impact on Help-Seeking Persons with Pedophilia in Germany—A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Horváth, Dóra & Szabó, Roland Zs., 2019. "Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 119-132.
    14. Ľuboš Slovák & Jan Daněk & Tomáš Daněk, 2023. "The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Waheed Hammad & Wajeha Al-Ani, 2021. "Building Educational Research Capacity: Challenges and Opportunities From the Perspectives of Faculty Members at a National University in Oman," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0468-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.