IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v88y2023i2d10.1007_s11336-023-09907-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blind Subgrouping of Task-based fMRI

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary F. Fisher

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Jonathan Parsons

    (Duke University)

  • Kathleen M. Gates

    (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • Joseph B. Hopfinger

    (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Abstract

Significant heterogeneity in network structures reflecting individuals’ dynamic processes can exist within subgroups of people (e.g., diagnostic category, gender). This makes it difficult to make inferences regarding these predefined subgroups. For this reason, researchers sometimes wish to identify subsets of individuals who have similarities in their dynamic processes regardless of any predefined category. This requires unsupervised classification of individuals based on similarities in their dynamic processes, or equivalently, in this case, similarities in their network structures of edges. The present paper tests a recently developed algorithm, S-GIMME, that takes into account heterogeneity across individuals with the aim of providing subgroup membership and precise information about the specific network structures that differentiate subgroups. The algorithm has previously provided robust and accurate classification when evaluated with large-scale simulation studies but has not yet been validated on empirical data. Here, we investigate S-GIMME’s ability to differentiate, in a purely data-driven manner, between brain states explicitly induced through different tasks in a new fMRI dataset. The results provide new evidence that the algorithm was able to resolve, in an unsupervised data-driven manner, the differences between different active brain states in empirical fMRI data to segregate individuals and arrive at subgroup-specific network structures of edges. The ability to arrive at subgroups that correspond to empirically designed fMRI task conditions, with no biasing or priors, suggests this data-driven approach can be a powerful addition to existing methods for unsupervised classification of individuals based on their dynamic processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary F. Fisher & Jonathan Parsons & Kathleen M. Gates & Joseph B. Hopfinger, 2023. "Blind Subgrouping of Task-based fMRI," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 434-455, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:88:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11336-023-09907-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-023-09907-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-023-09907-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-023-09907-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wiktor Olszowy & John Aston & Catarina Rua & Guy B. Williams, 2019. "Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Hudson F Golino & Sacha Epskamp, 2017. "Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Kathleen M Gates & Peter C M Molenaar & Swathi P Iyer & Joel T Nigg & Damien A Fair, 2014. "Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Wiktor Olszowy & John Aston & Catarina Rua & Guy B. Williams, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingkai Wang & Xi Luo & Yi Zhao & Brian Caffo, 2021. "Semiparametric partial common principal component analysis for covariance matrices," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1175-1186, December.
    2. Park, Jun Young & Polzehl, Joerg & Chatterjee, Snigdhansu & Brechmann, André & Fiecas, Mark, 2020. "Semiparametric modeling of time-varying activation and connectivity in task-based fMRI data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Andrey Nasledov & Sergey Miroshnikov & Liubov Tkacheva & Kirill Miroshnik & Meriam Uld Semeta, 2021. "Application of Psychometric Approach for ASD Evaluation in Russian 3–4-Year-Olds," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Raveenajit Kaur A. P. & Kalvant Singh & Alberto Luis August, 2021. "Exploring the Factor Structure of the Constructs of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK): An Exploratory Factor Analysis Based on the Perceptions of TESOL Pre-Service Teachers at ," Research Journal of Education, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(2), pages 103-115, 06-2021.
    5. Bing Li & Cody Ding & Huiying Shi & Fenghui Fan & Liya Guo, 2023. "Assessment of Psychological Zone of Optimal Performance among Professional Athletes: EGA and Item Response Theory Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Zhu, Xun & Pasch, Timothy J. & Bergstrom, Aaron, 2020. "Understanding the structure of risk belief systems concerning drone delivery: A network analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Hudson Golino & Alexander P. Christensen & Robert Moulder & Seohyun Kim & Steven M. Boker, 2022. "Modeling Latent Topics in Social Media using Dynamic Exploratory Graph Analysis: The Case of the Right-wing and Left-wing Trolls in the 2016 US Elections," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 156-187, March.
    8. Oscar Lecuona & Chung-Ying Lin & Dmitri Rozgonjuk & Tone M. Norekvål & Marjolein M. Iversen & Mohammed A. Mamun & Mark D. Griffiths & Ting-I Lin & Amir H. Pakpour, 2022. "A Network Analysis of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S): A Large-Scale Cross-Cultural Study in Iran, Bangladesh, and Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago & Gustavo Hermes Soares & Lisa Gaye Smithers & Rachel Roberts & Lisa Jamieson, 2022. "Psychological Network of Stress, Coping and Social Support in an Aboriginal Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Wei Fu & Hongping Zhang & Jeremy E. Whaley & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2023. "Do Consumers Perceive Cultivated Meat as a Sustainable Substitute to Conventional Meat? Assessing the Facilitators and Inhibitors of Cultivated Meat Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Nicola Magnavita & Carlo Chiorri, 2022. "Development and Validation of a New Measure of Work Annoyance Using a Psychometric Network Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Lukáš Copuš & Peter Madzík & Helena Šajgalíková & Karol Čarnogurský, 2023. "Is There a Possibility to Characterize an Organizational Culture by Its Selected Cultural Dimensions?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    13. Sacha Epskamp, 2020. "Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 206-231, March.
    14. Nadja Bodner & Laura Bringmann & Francis Tuerlinckx & Peter Jonge & Eva Ceulemans, 2022. "ConNEcT: A Novel Network Approach for Investigating the Co-occurrence of Binary Psychopathological Symptoms Over Time," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 107-132, March.
    15. Boris Forthmann & Mark A. Runco, 2020. "An Empirical Test of the Inter-Relationships between Various Bibliometric Creative Scholarship Indicators," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Maarten Marsman & Mijke Rhemtulla, 2022. "Guest Editors’ Introduction to The Special Issue “Network Psychometrics in Action”: Methodological Innovations Inspired by Empirical Problems," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Paul B. Perrin & Daniela Ramos-Usuga & Samuel J. West & Kritzia Merced & Daniel W. Klyce & Anthony H. Lequerica & Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa & Elisabet Alzueta & Fiona C. Baker & Stella Iacovides & Mar , 2022. "Network Analysis of Neurobehavioral Symptom Patterns in an International Sample of Spanish-Speakers with a History of COVID-19 and Controls," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Inken Höller & Dajana Schreiber & Fionneke Bos & Thomas Forkmann & Tobias Teismann & Jürgen Margraf, 2022. "The Mereology of Depression—Networks of Depressive Symptoms during the Course of Psychotherapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Yuki Nozaki & Alicia Puente-Martínez & Moïra Mikolajczak, 2019. "Evaluating the higher-order structure of the Profile of Emotional Competence (PEC): Confirmatory factor analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Juyeon Lee & Alvin Junus, 2024. "Differences and Similarities in Youth Social-emotional Competence Measurement Between North American and East Asian Countries: Exploratory Graph Analysis using the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional ," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 57-79, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:88:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11336-023-09907-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.