IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v86y2021i3d10.1007_s11336-021-09795-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Invited Special Section

Author

Listed:
  • Bryce B. Reeve

    (Duke University School of Medicine)

  • Ron D. Hays

    (UCLA)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryce B. Reeve & Ron D. Hays, 2021. "Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Invited Special Section," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 671-673, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:86:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-021-09795-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-021-09795-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-021-09795-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-021-09795-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.
    2. Steven P. Reise & Han Du & Emily F. Wong & Anne S. Hubbard & Mark G. Haviland, 2021. "Matching IRT Models to Patient-Reported Outcomes Constructs: The Graded Response and Log-Logistic Models for Scaling Depression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 800-824, September.
    3. Li Cai & Carrie R. Houts, 2021. "Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: Applications of Multilevel and Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 754-777, September.
    4. Ron D. Hays & Karen L. Spritzer & Steven P. Reise, 2021. "Using Item Response Theory to Identify Responders to Treatment: Examples with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Physical Function Scale and Emotional Distress Comp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 781-792, September.
    5. Benjamin D. Schalet & Sangdon Lim & David Cella & Seung W. Choi, 2021. "Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 717-746, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakob Bue Bjorner, 2021. "Solving the Tower of Babel Problem for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 747-753, September.
    2. Karl Bang Christensen, 2021. "Comments on ‘Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: Applications of Multilevel and Multidimensional Item Response Theory’," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 778-780, September.
    3. Paul Boeck & Sun-Joo Cho, 2021. "Not all DIF is shaped similarly," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 712-716, September.
    4. McAleavey, Andrew Athan, 2021. "When (Not) to Rely on the Reliable Change Index," OSF Preprints 3kthg, Center for Open Science.
    5. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2021. "Assessing the Accuracy of Errors of Measurement. Implications for Assessing Reliable Change in Clinical settings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 793-799, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:86:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-021-09795-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.