IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v6y2022i6d10.1007_s41669-022-00362-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is the Economic Cost of Providing an All Wales Postpartum Haemorrhage Quality Improvement Initiative (OBS Cymru)? A Cost-Consequences Comparison with Standard Care

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Dale

    (Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board)

  • Sarah F Bell

    (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Susan O’Connell

    (Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board)

  • Cerys Scarr

    (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Kathryn James

    (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Miriam John

    (Aneurin Bevan University Health Board)

  • Rachel E Collis

    (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Peter W Collins

    (Cardiff University)

  • Grace Carolan-Rees

Abstract

Background and Objective A postpartum haemorrhage quality improvement initiative (the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales [OBS Cymru]), including about 60,000 maternities, was adopted across Wales (2017–2018). We performed a cost-consequences analysis to inform ongoing provision and wider uptake. Methods Analysis was based on primary data from the All Wales postpartum haemorrhage database, with a UK National Health Services perspective, a time horizon from delivery until hospital discharge and no discounting. Costs were based on UK published sources with viscoelastic haemostatic assay costs provided by the OBS Cymru national team. Mean costs per eligible patient (postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 mL) were calculated for OBS Cymru, using the early implementation period as a comparator. Modelling allowed comparisons of three scenarios (two predefined and one post hoc) and implementation in different sizes of maternity unit. Results All analyses demonstrated consistent savings in blood products, critical care and haematology time, and also a reduced occurrence of massive postpartum haemorrhage (> 2500 mL). Incremental postnatal length of stay varied between scenarios, substantially impacting on total costs. Mean incremental cost of OBS Cymru, compared with standard care, across Wales was £18.41 per patient (postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 mL) or − £10.66 if the length of stay was excluded. Modelling a maternity unit of 5000 births per annum, OBS Cymru incurred an incremental cost of £9.53 per patient with postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 mL. Conclusions OBS Cymru reduces the occurrence of massive postpartum haemorrhage, need for transfusions, quantity of blood products and intensive care. In medium-to-large maternity units (>3000 maternities per annum), the OBS Cymru intervention approaches cost neutrality compared to standard care.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Dale & Sarah F Bell & Susan O’Connell & Cerys Scarr & Kathryn James & Miriam John & Rachel E Collis & Peter W Collins & Grace Carolan-Rees, 2022. "What is the Economic Cost of Providing an All Wales Postpartum Haemorrhage Quality Improvement Initiative (OBS Cymru)? A Cost-Consequences Comparison with Standard Care," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(6), pages 847-857, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00362-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00362-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-022-00362-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-022-00362-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00362-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.