IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i4d10.1007_s40273-022-01237-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Effectiveness of Difelikefalin Compared to Standard Care for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease Associated Pruritus (CKD-aP) in People with Kidney Failure Receiving Haemodialysis

Author

Listed:
  • Praveen Thokala

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Pann Ei Hnynn Si

    (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Monica Hernandez Alava

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Alessandro Sasso

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Thilo Schaufler

    (Vifor Pharma Intl.)

  • Marco Soro

    (Vifor Pharma Intl.)

  • James Fotheringham

    (University of Sheffield
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)

Abstract

Background Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is associated with an increased risk of depression, poor sleep and reduced health-related quality of life. Two phase III studies (KALM-1 and KALM-2) of difelikefalin showed reduced CKD-aP severity and improved itch-related health-related quality of life in patients with moderate and severe CKD-aP receiving haemodialysis for kidney failure. Objective We aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of difelikefalin for patients with CKD-aP receiving haemodialysis for kidney failure compared to standard care from a UK National Health Service perspective. Methods A cohort model was developed with four health states representing levels of pruritus intensity over time, based on the KALM trials augmented with longer term CKD-aP severity data from another haemodialysis trial (SHAREHD) for standard care. Utilities were estimated from a mapping study of 5-D Itch to EQ-5D-5L in 487 patients receiving haemodialysis, costs were estimated based on resource use alongside the SHAREHD and 2018 unit costs, and inflated to 2021 costs. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A de novo economic model was developed in Microsoft Excel with scenario analyses performed using a range of assumptions. Results In the base-case analysis over a time horizon of 64 weeks, using a placeholder cost of £75 per 28-days for difelikefalin, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of difelikefalin compared with standard care was £19,558/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Scenario analyses resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that ranged from £10,154/QALY (severe only) to £16,957/QALY (5-year horizon) for difelikefalin compared to standard care. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested difelikefalin has a 48.6% probability of being cost effective at a threshold of £20,000/QALY and a 57.2% probability of being cost effective at a threshold of £30,000/QALY. Conclusions The cost effectiveness of difelikefalin in a range of scenarios could make it an important pharmacotherapy to address the high burden of disease and unmet need for treatments associated with CKD-aP in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Praveen Thokala & Pann Ei Hnynn Si & Monica Hernandez Alava & Alessandro Sasso & Thilo Schaufler & Marco Soro & James Fotheringham, 2023. "Cost Effectiveness of Difelikefalin Compared to Standard Care for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease Associated Pruritus (CKD-aP) in People with Kidney Failure Receiving Haemodialysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 457-466, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01237-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01237-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-022-01237-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-022-01237-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01237-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.