IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v6y2013i3p189-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Utility of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Scales in Novel Patient Populations with Pancreatic Cancer, Lung Cancer, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmina Ivanova
  • Daniel Mytelka
  • Mei Duh
  • Howard Birnbaum
  • Alice Cummings
  • Alexandra San Roman
  • Gregory Price
  • Ralph Swindle

Abstract

The Katz ADL, Rosow–Breslau IADL, and Nagi scales collected in the MCBS demonstrate acceptable internal consistency and test–retest reliability among patients with pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, and MPN, and are consistent with clinical worsening following diagnosis or hospitalization. These results suggest that using retrospective data may allow researchers to conduct preliminary assessments of existing PRO instruments in new populations of interest and generate useful exploratory disease information before embarking on de novo PRO development. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmina Ivanova & Daniel Mytelka & Mei Duh & Howard Birnbaum & Alice Cummings & Alexandra San Roman & Gregory Price & Ralph Swindle, 2013. "Evaluating the Utility of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Scales in Novel Patient Populations with Pancreatic Cancer, Lung Cancer, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Using Medicare Current Beneficiary," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 6(3), pages 189-200, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:6:y:2013:i:3:p:189-200
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0018-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40271-013-0018-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-013-0018-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:6:y:2013:i:3:p:189-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.