IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i3d10.1007_s40271-023-00618-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focus Groups to Inform the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs)

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Elstad

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • Fraser D. Bocell

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Tamika Cowans Owens

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • Dilani Logan

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • Emily Melluso

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • Claire Viscione

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • San Keller

    (American Institutes for Research)

  • Allen Chen

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Jessica Weinberg

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Veronica Sansing-Foster

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Leah Royce

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Phillip Woods

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Andrew I. Steen

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

  • Adriana Ineveld

    (The TMJ Association)

  • Michelle Reardon

    (The TMJ Association)

  • Allen Cowley

    (The TMJ Association)

  • John Kusiak

    (The TMJ Association)

  • Deanne Clare

    (The TMJ Association)

  • Terrie Cowley

    (The TMJ Association)

  • Michelle E. Tarver

    (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)

Abstract

Background Understanding symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) can help doctors and patients document, monitor, and manage the disease and help researchers evaluate interventions. Patients with TMDs experience symptoms ranging from mild to severe, primarily in the head and neck region. This study describes findings from formative patient focus groups to capture, categorize, and prioritize symptoms of TMDs towards the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Methods We conducted ten focus groups with 40 men and women with mild, moderate, and severe TMD. Focus groups elicited descriptions of symptoms and asked participants to review a list of existing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the literature and patient advisor input and speak to how those PROs reflect their own experience, including rating their importance. Results We identified 52 distinct concepts across six domains: somatic, physical, social, sexual, affective, and sleep. Focus groups identified the ability to chew and eat; clicking, popping, and other jaw noises; jaw pain and headaches; jaw misalignment or dislocation; grinding, clenching, or chewing, including at night; and ear sensations as most important. Participants with severe TMDs more often reported affective concepts like depression and shame than did participants with mild or moderate TMDs. Conclusion Findings support PROM item development for TMDs, including selecting existing PROMs or developing new ones that reflect patients’ lived experiences, priorities, and preferred terminology. Such measures are needed to increase understanding of TMDs, promote accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, and help advance research on TMDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Elstad & Fraser D. Bocell & Tamika Cowans Owens & Dilani Logan & Emily Melluso & Claire Viscione & San Keller & Allen Chen & Jessica Weinberg & Veronica Sansing-Foster & Leah Royce & Phillip Woo, 2023. "Focus Groups to Inform the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs)," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(3), pages 265-276, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00618-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00618-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-023-00618-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-023-00618-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00618-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.