IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v13y2020i5d10.1007_s40271-020-00436-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real World Survey of Patient Engagement Status in Clinical Research: The First Input from Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Nanae Tanemura

    (Keio University)

  • Tsuyoshi Sasaki

    (Chiba University Hospital)

  • Junko Sato

    (Keio University
    Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency)

  • Hisashi Urushihara

    (Keio University)

Abstract

Background The updated international draft guidelines, the “General Considerations for Clinical Studies, ICH E8 (R1)”, state that patient engagement ensures that all perspectives are captured in the research process; however, this is not well understood, specifically in Japan. Objective This study examined the current status and perceptions of patient engagement in clinical research from the perspectives of patient groups, pharmaceutical corporations, and researchers in Japan, using anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Methods Three online surveys were conducted with patient groups (n = 100), pharmaceutical corporations (n = 66), and researchers (n = 300) in May and June 2019. The main variables were the current status and the current perception of patient engagement in clinical research. Results The response rate was 71% for patient groups and 85% for pharmaceutical corporations, and there were 300 valid responses (emergence rate: 4.9%) from researchers. Experiences with clinical research involving patient engagement were reported by 76.5% of the patients, 21.4% of the pharmaceutical corporations, and 51.7% of the researchers. Patient groups reported three major factors that negatively impacted their relationship with pharmaceutical corporations and researchers: (1) ‘lack of understanding of the benefits of partnering’; (2) ‘lack of transparency or openness’; and (3) ‘unclear or ill-defined processes’. Conclusions Pharmaceutical corporations in Japan have less experience with patient engagement in clinical research than other stakeholders. A neutral connecting system among the stakeholders with a constructive co-learning system will allow effective involvement/engagement of patient groups for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanae Tanemura & Tsuyoshi Sasaki & Junko Sato & Hisashi Urushihara, 2020. "Real World Survey of Patient Engagement Status in Clinical Research: The First Input from Japan," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(5), pages 623-632, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00436-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00436-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00436-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-020-00436-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00436-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.