IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v99y2019i1d10.1007_s11069-019-03759-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability assessment of population in mountain settlements exposed to debris flow: a case study on Qipan gully, Wenchuan County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingtao Ding

    (Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Tao Huang

    (Southwest Jiaotong University)

Abstract

This research selected the Qipan gully as a study area for field investigation. The vulnerability of the population to debris flows in Qipan gully was assessed. Several valuation factors were considered such as family size, age structure, the physical condition of its members, ethnic characteristics, culture level, and distance to known debris flow events. A self-organizing map (SOM) approach was used in order to prevent man-made subjective factors in influencing evaluation index weights. MATLAB and ArcGIS were employed to determine the degree of population vulnerability to debris flow disaster. Population vulnerability of Qipan gully basin was mainly identified on densely populated places. The highest vulnerability was observed in a debris flow ditch mouth, which decreased to surrounding areas. Areas with extremely high-vulnerability and high-vulnerability degree featured a small percentage of the total area of the gully, with 3.52% and 4.90%, respectively. Extremely low-vulnerability and low-vulnerability degree areas exhibited high percentages of 22.98% and 60.06%, respectively. The analysis of the SOM U-matrix and the 18 variable planes hints that higher population vulnerabilities are related to medium or large families, with members of national minorities, primary education, and within 300 m to the debris flow gully. Age structure and members physical condition posed certain effects, but the degree of influence was low for this case study. The results can be used as a reference for reducing casualties in Qipan gully.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingtao Ding & Tao Huang, 2019. "Vulnerability assessment of population in mountain settlements exposed to debris flow: a case study on Qipan gully, Wenchuan County, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 553-569, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03759-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03759-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03759-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-019-03759-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Su & Linrong Xu & Bo Yang & Yongwei Li & Fengyu Gu, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Single-Gully Debris Flow Based on Dynamic Changes in Provenance in the Wenchuan Earthquake Zone: A Case Study of the Qipan Gully," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Alex Y. Lo & Shuwen Liu & Alice S. Y. Chow & Qing Pei & Lewis T. O. Cheung & Lincoln Fok, 2021. "Business vulnerability assessment: a firm-level analysis of micro- and small businesses in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 867-890, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03759-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.