IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v85y2017i2d10.1007_s11069-016-2620-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hurricane genesis modelling based on the relationship between solar activity and hurricanes

Author

Listed:
  • Yaroslav Vyklyuk

    (Bukovinian University)

  • Milan Radovanović

    (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Boško Milovanović

    (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Taras Leko

    (Bukovinian University)

  • Milan Milenković

    (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Zoran Milošević

    (Primary School Janko Veselinović)

  • Ana Milanović Pešić

    (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

  • Dejana Jakovljević

    (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)

Abstract

The work examines the potential causative link between the flow of charged particles that are coming from the Sun and hurricanes. For establishing eventual link, the method of correlation analysis is applied, but with the phase shift of 0–5 days. There are nine parameters which are observed as an input, and daily values of the hurricane phenomenon are observed as an output in the period May–October 1999–2013. The results that have been obtained are considerably weak, leading to the need of applying the method of nonlinear analysis. The R/S analysis was conducted to determine the degree of randomness for time series of input and output parameters. The calculated Hurst index of variables X 4–X 9 is persistent (0.71–0.96). That allows us to conclude that the dynamics of these time series is heavily dependent on the same factors or on each other. Unlike the previous index, we have concluded that the behavior of high-energy protons (X 1–X 3) and the number of hurricane time series are completely stochastic. The problem of finding hidden dependencies in large databases refers to problems of data mining. The Sugeno function of zero order was selected as a method of output fuzzy system. Bearing in mind the available equipment, the models had to be shortened to the phase shift of 0–3 days. The “brute-force attack” method was used to find the most significant factors from all data. Within the experiments, six input factors were calculated which became the basis for building the final ANFIS models. These models can predict 22–26 % of the hurricanes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaroslav Vyklyuk & Milan Radovanović & Boško Milovanović & Taras Leko & Milan Milenković & Zoran Milošević & Ana Milanović Pešić & Dejana Jakovljević, 2017. "Hurricane genesis modelling based on the relationship between solar activity and hurricanes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1043-1062, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2620-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2620-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2620-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2620-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masoomeh Mirrashid, 2014. "Earthquake magnitude prediction by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based on fuzzy C-means algorithm," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1577-1593, December.
    2. Shahram Kaboodvandpour & Jamil Amanollahi & Samira Qhavami & Bakhtiyar Mohammadi, 2015. "Assessing the accuracy of multiple regressions, ANFIS, and ANN models in predicting dust storm occurrences in Sanandaj, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 879-893, September.
    3. Bagher Shirmohammadi & Hamidreza Moradi & Vahid Moosavi & Majid Semiromi & Ali Zeinali, 2013. "Forecasting of meteorological drought using Wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for different time steps (case study: southeastern part of east Azerbaijan province, Iran)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 389-402, October.
    4. Phuoc Nguyen & Lloyd Chua & Lam Son, 2014. "Flood forecasting in large rivers with data-driven models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(1), pages 767-784, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Slavica Malinović-Milićević & Milan M. Radovanović & Sonja D. Radenković & Yaroslav Vyklyuk & Boško Milovanović & Ana Milanović Pešić & Milan Milenković & Vladimir Popović & Marko Petrović & Petro Syd, 2023. "Application of Solar Activity Time Series in Machine Learning Predictive Modeling of Precipitation-Induced Floods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Aleksandra Nina & Vladimir A. Srećković & Milan Radovanović, 2019. "Multidisciplinarity in Research of Extreme Solar Energy Influences on Natural Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6, February.
    3. Lijie Zhang & Huiyun Zhu & Jiancheng Liu, 2021. "Characteristics of tropical cyclones formed in the Eastern Pacific Northwest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2619-2633, April.
    4. Tamara Lukić & Jelena Dunjić & Bojan Đerčan & Ivana Penjišević & Saša Milosavljević & Milka Bubalo-Živković & Milica Solarević, 2018. "Local Resilience to Natural Hazards in Serbia. Case Study: The West Morava River Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sutapa Chaudhuri & Arumita Roy Chowdhury & Payel Das, 2018. "Implementation of Sugeno: ANFIS for forecasting the seismic moment of large earthquakes over Indo-Himalayan region," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 391-405, January.
    2. Ozgur Kisi & Armin Azad & Hamed Kashi & Amir Saeedian & Seyed Ali Asghar Hashemi & Salar Ghorbani, 2019. "Modeling Groundwater Quality Parameters Using Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy Methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 847-861, January.
    3. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Ahmed A. Ewees & Hong Fan & Mohamed Abd Elaziz, 2020. "Optimized Forecasting Method for Weekly Influenza Confirmed Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Jamil Amanollahi & Shahram Kaboodvandpour & Hiva Majidi, 2017. "Evaluating the accuracy of ANN and LR models to estimate the water quality in Zarivar International Wetland, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1511-1527, February.
    5. Anurag Malik & Anil Kumar & Rajesh P. Singh, 2019. "Application of Heuristic Approaches for Prediction of Hydrological Drought Using Multi-scalar Streamflow Drought Index," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(11), pages 3985-4006, September.
    6. Yixiang Sun & Deshan Tang & Yifei Sun & Qingfeng Cui, 2016. "Comparison of a fuzzy control and the data-driven model for flood forecasting," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 827-844, June.
    7. Lu Bai & Jianzhou Wang & Xuejiao Ma & Haiyan Lu, 2018. "Air Pollution Forecasts: An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-44, April.
    8. K. M. Asim & F. Martínez-Álvarez & A. Basit & T. Iqbal, 2017. "Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 471-486, January.
    9. Hassan Sharafi & Isa Ebtehaj & Hossein Bonakdari & Amir Hossein Zaji, 2016. "Design of a support vector machine with different kernel functions to predict scour depth around bridge piers," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2145-2162, December.
    10. Vahid Moosavi & Ali Talebi & Mohammad Reza Hadian, 2017. "Development of a Hybrid Wavelet Packet- Group Method of Data Handling (WPGMDH) Model for Runoff Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(1), pages 43-59, January.
    11. Iman Khosravi & Yaser Jouybari-Moghaddam & Mohammad Reza Sarajian, 2017. "The comparison of NN, SVR, LSSVR and ANFIS at modeling meteorological and remotely sensed drought indices over the eastern district of Isfahan, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1507-1522, July.
    12. Anshuka Anshuka & Floris F. van Ogtrop & R. Willem Vervoort, 2019. "Drought forecasting through statistical models using standardised precipitation index: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 955-977, June.
    13. Mandeep Kaur & Pankaj Deep Kaur & Sandeep Kumar Sood, 2021. "Energy efficient IoT-based cloud framework for early flood prediction," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2053-2076, December.
    14. Shahram Kaboodvandpour & Jamil Amanollahi & Samira Qhavami & Bakhtiyar Mohammadi, 2015. "Assessing the accuracy of multiple regressions, ANFIS, and ANN models in predicting dust storm occurrences in Sanandaj, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 879-893, September.
    15. Rabia Tehseen & Muhammad Shoaib Farooq & Adnan Abid, 2020. "Earthquake Prediction Using Expert Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2620-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.