IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v84y2016i3d10.1007_s11069-016-2513-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic parameter sensitivity in numerical modelling of cyclone-induced waves: a multi-look approach using advanced meta-modelling techniques

Author

Listed:
  • J. Rohmer

    (BRGM)

  • S. Lecacheux

    (BRGM)

  • R. Pedreros

    (BRGM)

  • H. Quetelard

    (Direction Régionale de Météo-France pour l’Océan Indien)

  • F. Bonnardot

    (Direction Régionale de Météo-France pour l’Océan Indien)

  • D. Idier

    (BRGM)

Abstract

The knowledge and prediction of cyclones as well as wave models experienced significant improvements in this last decade, opening the perspective of a better understanding of the wave sensitivity to the cyclone characteristics (e.g. track angle of approach θ, forward speed V f, radius of maximum wind R m, landfall position x o, etc.). Physically, waves are strongly linked to the time-varying evolution of the relative cyclone position. Thus, even assuming the main cyclone characteristics to be stationary, exploring the role played by each of them should necessarily be conducted in a dynamic manner. This problem is investigated using the advanced statistical tools of variance-based global sensitivity analysis (VBSA) in different ways to provide an overall view of wave height sensitivity to cyclone characteristics: (1) step-by-step: by computing the time series of sensitivity measures; (2) aggregated: by summarising the time-varying information into a single sensitivity indicator; (3). mode-based: by studying the sensitivity with respect to the occurrence of specific temporal patterns (e.g. up-down translation of the overall series). Yet, applying this multi-look dynamic sensitivity analysis faces two major difficulties: (1) VBSA requires a large number of simulations (typically > 10,000), which appears to be incompatible with the large computation time cost of numerical codes (>several hours for a single run); (2) integrating the time dimension imposes to process a large amount of information via vectors of large size (e.g. series of significant wave height H S discretised over several hundreds of time steps). In this study, we propose a joint procedure combining kriging meta-modelling (to overcome the 1st issue) and principal component analysis techniques (to overcome the 2nd issue by summarising the time information into a limited number of components). The applicability of this strategy is tested and demonstrated on a real case (Sainte-Suzanne city, located at Reunion Island) using a set of 100 cyclone-induced H S series, each of them being computed for different scenarios of cyclone characteristics, i.e. using only 100 long-running simulations. The key role of R m over the whole evolution of H S is shown by means of the aggregated option, with a more specific influence in the vicinity of Sainte-Suzanne (when the cyclone eye is located less than 200 km away from the site) as highlighted by the step-by-step option. The step-by-step option also highlights the influence of the landfall position on the H S peak reached in strong interaction with θ and R m. Finally, the role of V f in the occurrence of a turning point marking a shift near landfall between regimes of low-to-high H S values is also identified. The above results provide guidelines for future research efforts on cyclone characteristics prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Rohmer & S. Lecacheux & R. Pedreros & H. Quetelard & F. Bonnardot & D. Idier, 2016. "Dynamic parameter sensitivity in numerical modelling of cyclone-induced waves: a multi-look approach using advanced meta-modelling techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1765-1792, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2513-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2513-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2513-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2513-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campbell, Katherine & McKay, Michael D. & Williams, Brian J., 2006. "Sensitivity analysis when model outputs are functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1468-1472.
    2. Jeremy Rohmer, 2014. "Dynamic sensitivity analysis of long-running landslide models through basis set expansion and meta-modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 5-22, August.
    3. Wenceslao González‐Manteiga & Rosa M. Crujeiras & Anestis Antoniadis & Céline Helbert & Clémentine Prieur & Laurence Viry, 2012. "Spatio‐temporal metamodeling for West African monsoon," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 24-36, February.
    4. Youn Song & Jennifer Irish & Ikpoto Udoh, 2012. "Regional attributes of hurricane surge response functions for hazard assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1475-1490, November.
    5. Storlie, Curtis B. & Reich, Brian J. & Helton, Jon C. & Swiler, Laura P. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2013. "Analysis of computationally demanding models with continuous and categorical inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 30-41.
    6. Storlie, Curtis B. & Swiler, Laura P. & Helton, Jon C. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2009. "Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1735-1763.
    7. Li, Baibing & Martin, Elaine B. & Morris, A. Julian, 2002. "On principal component analysis in L1," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 471-474, September.
    8. Donald Resio & Jennifer Irish & Mary Cialone, 2009. "A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment – part 1: basic concepts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 51(1), pages 163-182, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. WoongHee Jung & Aikaterini P. Kyprioti & Ehsan Adeli & Alexandros A. Taflanidis, 2023. "Exploring the sensitivity of probabilistic surge estimates to forecast errors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1371-1409, January.
    3. Aikaterini P. Kyprioti & Alexandros A. Taflanidis & Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo & Madison O. Campbell, 2021. "Incorporation of sea level rise in storm surge surrogate modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 531-563, January.
    4. Jize Zhang & Alexandros A. Taflanidis & Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo & Jeffrey A. Melby & Fatimata Diop, 2018. "Advances in surrogate modeling for storm surge prediction: storm selection and addressing characteristics related to climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1225-1253, December.
    5. S. Lecacheux & J. Rohmer & F. Paris & R. Pedreros & H. Quetelard & F. Bonnardot, 2021. "Toward the probabilistic forecasting of cyclone-induced marine flooding by overtopping at Reunion Island aided by a time-varying random-forest classification approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 227-251, January.
    6. López-Lopera, Andrés F. & Idier, Déborah & Rohmer, Jérémy & Bachoc, François, 2022. "Multioutput Gaussian processes with functional data: A study on coastal flood hazard assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaofeng Jia & Alexandros Taflanidis & Norberto Nadal-Caraballo & Jeffrey Melby & Andrew Kennedy & Jane Smith, 2016. "Surrogate modeling for peak or time-dependent storm surge prediction over an extended coastal region using an existing database of synthetic storms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(2), pages 909-938, March.
    2. Jeremy Rohmer, 2014. "Dynamic sensitivity analysis of long-running landslide models through basis set expansion and meta-modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 5-22, August.
    3. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    4. Gaofeng Jia & Alexandros A. Taflanidis & Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo & Jeffrey A. Melby & Andrew B. Kennedy & Jane M. Smith, 2016. "Surrogate modeling for peak or time-dependent storm surge prediction over an extended coastal region using an existing database of synthetic storms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(2), pages 909-938, March.
    5. Nagel, Joseph B. & Rieckermann, Jörg & Sudret, Bruno, 2020. "Principal component analysis and sparse polynomial chaos expansions for global sensitivity analysis and model calibration: Application to urban drainage simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Heredia, María Belén & Prieur, Clémentine & Eckert, Nicolas, 2021. "Nonparametric estimation of aggregated Sobol’ indices: Application to a depth averaged snow avalanche model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Daniel W. Gladish & Ross Darnell & Peter J. Thorburn & Bhakti Haldankar, 2019. "Emulated Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Computer Models Applied to Agricultural Simulators," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 130-153, March.
    8. Lamboni, Matieyendou & Monod, Hervé & Makowski, David, 2011. "Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 450-459.
    9. Curtis B. Storlie & William A. Lane & Emily M. Ryan & James R. Gattiker & David M. Higdon, 2015. "Calibration of Computational Models With Categorical Parameters and Correlated Outputs via Bayesian Smoothing Spline ANOVA," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 68-82, March.
    10. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    11. Tian, Wei, 2013. "A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 411-419.
    12. Raymond K. W. Wong & Curtis B. Storlie & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2017. "A frequentist approach to computer model calibration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 635-648, March.
    13. Xiao, Sinan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Xu, Liyang, 2017. "Multivariate sensitivity analysis based on the direction of eigen space through principal component analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    15. Di Maio, Francesco & Bandini, Alessandro & Zio, Enrico & Alberola, Sofia Carlos & Sanchez-Saez, Francisco & Martorell, Sebastián, 2016. "Bootstrapped-ensemble-based Sensitivity Analysis of a trace thermal-hydraulic model based on a limited number of PWR large break loca simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 122-134.
    16. Girard, Sylvain & Romary, Thomas & Favennec, Jean-Melaine & Stabat, Pascal & Wackernagel, Hans, 2013. "Sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of a steam generator model for clogging diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 143-153.
    17. K. Sham Bhat & David S. Mebane & Priyadarshi Mahapatra & Curtis B. Storlie, 2017. "Upscaling Uncertainty with Dynamic Discrepancy for a Multi-Scale Carbon Capture System," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1453-1467, October.
    18. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Xie, Min & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Generalized moment-independent importance measures based on Minkowski distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 449-455.
    19. Nick Taylor & Jennifer Irish & Ikpoto Udoh & Matthew Bilskie & Scott Hagen, 2015. "Development and uncertainty quantification of hurricane surge response functions for hazard assessment in coastal bays," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1103-1123, June.
    20. Alexandros Taflanidis & Gaofeng Jia & Andrew Kennedy & Jane Smith, 2013. "Implementation/optimization of moving least squares response surfaces for approximation of hurricane/storm surge and wave responses," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 955-983, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2513-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.