IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v75y2015i2p1577-1598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence for non-self-similarity in the M w 7.7 2001 Bhuj earthquake sequence

Author

Listed:
  • Manish Kumar
  • V. Yallanki
  • Koushik Biswas
  • Prantik Mandal

Abstract

Scaled energy, apparent stress, seismic moments, stress drops and corner frequencies are measured through the Levenberg–Marquardt nonlinear inversion modeling of S-wave displacement spectra for 489 selected earthquakes (M w 2.05–5.52) from the 2001 M w 7.7 Bhuj earthquake sequence. The iterative inversion scheme is formulated based on the ω-square source spectral model, which enabled us to estimate stable source parameters. The estimated seismic moment (M o ) and source radius (r) vary from 1.5 × 10 12 to 2.4 × 10 17 to N m and 139.1–933.9 m, respectively, while estimated stress drops (Δσ) and the multiplicative factor (E mo ) values range from 0.1 to 14.4 MPa and 1.0–4.1, respectively. The corner frequencies (f c ) are found to be ranging from 1.4 to 9.3 Hz. The mean standard deviation for f c , r and Δσ are estimated to be 0.7 Hz, 91.4 m and 2.9 MPa, respectively. The radiated seismic energy and apparent stresses range from 2.1 × 10 5 to 4.1 × 10 13 Joule and 0.005–8.0 MPa, respectively. Our estimated corner frequencies and seismic moments satisfy the relation M o ∞ f c −(3+ε) , where ε (measure for a deviation from self-similarity) is found to be 1.33 for the larger earthquakes (M o ≥ 2 × 10 15 N m), while the parameter ε is estimated to be 6.74 for smaller earthquakes (M o > 2 × 10 15 N m). We feel that the larger value of ε may require to satisfy the increasing trend of scaled energy with moment for smaller earthquakes. We also notice that stress drops increase with seismic moment, approximately as Mo 3 (Δσ∝M o 3 ) for smaller events (M o > 10 15.3 N m), while for larger earthquakes (M o ≥ 2 × 10 15 N m) stress drop increases approximately with M o 1 (Δσ∝M o 1 ). Adding credence to this non-self-similar theory, our estimated seismic moments and source radii (r) also reveal a break in the linear self-similar source scaling at M o = 2 × 10 15 N m and r = 300 m, which is attributed to constant source radius for smaller earthquakes. Further, a comparative study between apparent stresses and static stress drops suggests a probable frictional overshoot mechanism for larger earthquakes, while smaller shocks are showing both partial stress drop and frictional overshoot mechanisms. We hypothesize that larger events are probably subject to the regional state-of-stress and fluid flow in the fault zone, whereas smaller earthquakes are sensitive to the local state-of-stress associated with material heterogeneities and fluid flows within the fault zone. We also propose that the relations developed in this study could be useful for accessing proper seismic hazard in the region. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Manish Kumar & V. Yallanki & Koushik Biswas & Prantik Mandal, 2015. "Evidence for non-self-similarity in the M w 7.7 2001 Bhuj earthquake sequence," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 1577-1598, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1577-1598
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1381-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1381-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-014-1381-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1577-1598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.