IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i1d10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slope-scale landslide susceptibility assessment based on coupled models of frequency ratio and multiple regression analysis with limited historical hazards data

Author

Listed:
  • Jianfeng Sun

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Tiesheng Yan

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Jinshu Hu

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Chao Ma

    (Southern Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute)

  • Jiajun Gao

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Hui Xu

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

Abstract

Conducting a precise landslide susceptibility assessment at the slope scale is challenging due to complex parameters and limited historical hazards data. This paper proposes a susceptibility assessment model based on the frequency ratio (FR) coupled with multiple regression analysis to solve these problems. Assessment factors were identified through field surveys and remote sensing interpretation. We utilized multiple methods, such as logistic regression (LR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), ridge regression (RR), stepwise regression (SR), and discriminant analysis (DA), and established five coupled models (FR-LR, FR-PLSR, FR-RR, FR-SR, and FR-DA). The reliability of the susceptibility assessment results was systematically verified. The results showed the following: (1) for the distribution of the susceptibility index, FR-PLSR, FR-RR, and FR-DA are close to the standard normal distribution; (2) for the prediction accuracy, the AUC indexes of the five models are relatively large, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87; and (3) for the susceptibility zoning reliability, FR-PLSR and FR-RR showed better performance, with a relatively smaller area proportion and larger susceptibility intensity for high susceptibility regions. Finally, the coupled models FR-PLSR and FR-RR were recommended. The areas of slope units categorized as high-, medium-, low-, and extra low-susceptibility are 16.14 km2, 73.85 km2, 98.96 km2, and 39.49 km2, respectively, accounting for 7.06%, 32.33%, 43.32%, and 17.29% of the study area. This work enriches the theoretical understanding of the susceptibility assessment models with limited historical hazards data and provides an effective coupled model for high-accuracy landslide assessment and prevention at the slope scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianfeng Sun & Tiesheng Yan & Jinshu Hu & Chao Ma & Jiajun Gao & Hui Xu, 2024. "Slope-scale landslide susceptibility assessment based on coupled models of frequency ratio and multiple regression analysis with limited historical hazards data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06176-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06176-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.