IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i1d10.1007_s11069-023-06174-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying bridges prone to instream wood accumulation: insights from bridges across the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Bangnira

    (University of Surrey)

  • Belen Marti-Cardona

    (University of Surrey)

  • Boulent Imam

    (University of Surrey)

  • Virginia Ruiz-Villanueva

    (University of Lausanne
    University of Bern)

Abstract

Accumulation of instream large wood (i.e., fallen trees, trunks, branches, and roots) at bridges during floods may exacerbate flooding, scour and cause structural failure. Yet, explaining and predicting the likelihood of a bridge trapping wood remains challenging. Quantitative data regarding wood accumulation at bridges are scarce, and most equations proposed to estimate the accumulation probability were derived from laboratory experiments, and include variables such as flow velocity, Froude number, and approaching wood volume or size which are difficult to obtain. Other evaluations based on technical reports and information regarding wood removal have been proposed but are mostly qualitative. Until now, a data-driven approach combining multiple quantitative accessible variables at the river reach and catchment scales remains lacking. As a result, the controlling parameters explaining whether a bridge is prone to trap wood are still unclear. This work aims to fill this gap by analysing a database of 49 bridges across the United Kingdom (UK) classified as prone and not prone to wood accumulation. The database contained information regarding the geometry of the bridge (i.e., number of piers and pier shape) and we added parameters describing the upstream river channel morphology, the riparian landcover, and high-flow characteristics. We applied multivariate statistics and a machine learning approach to identify the variables that explained and predicted the predisposition of bridges to wood accumulation. Results showed that the number of bridge piers, the unit stream power, the pier shape, and the riparian forested area explained 87% of the total variability for the training dataset (0.87 training accuracy), and the selected model had a testing accuracy of 0.60 (60%). Although limited by the sample size, this study sheds light on the identification of bridges prone to wood accumulation and can inform bridge design and management to mitigate wood-related hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Bangnira & Belen Marti-Cardona & Boulent Imam & Virginia Ruiz-Villanueva, 2024. "Identifying bridges prone to instream wood accumulation: insights from bridges across the UK," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(1), pages 25-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06174-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06174-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06174-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06174-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06174-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.